The role of international law in the elimination of child labor
In: Procedural aspects of international law 28
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Procedural aspects of international law 28
In: International affairs, Band 84, Heft 5, S. 1043-1044
ISSN: 0020-5850
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 972-972
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: International & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 109
ISSN: 0020-5893
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 109-129
ISSN: 1471-6895
Policy-making in the European Community in the area of education for migrants is driven by two conflicting pressures. On one side, the principle of effectiveness requires that the rights of free movement within the Community be supported by the best possible education for the children of migrants. However, on the other side is the importance of primary education to the member States as a political and cultural matter. This pressure is reinforced by the principle of subsidiarity. Member States have been relatively willing to support co-operative action by the Community in the area of higher education, such as in the ERASMUS exchange programmes. However, member States have been active in protecting their jurisdiction over education policy, particularly at the primary and secondary levels. As result, Community laws protecting the education rights of migrants have been most effective where two factors are present: first, that the rules are closely attached to the rights of free movement within the single market; and second, that the rules interfere as little as possible with substantive education policy. The first factor constitutes a significant weakness in Community education rights because it has created a distinction between Community migrants and those from third countries. The second factor has meant that the only Community policy on the education of migrants which could be described as an education right is the guarantee of equality of access to education within a member State.
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 476-476
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: In Beate Sjåfjell and Christopher M. Bruner (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Chapter 4.
SSRN
Working paper
In: Common Market Law Review, Band 36, Heft 6, S. 1243-1270
ISSN: 0165-0750
"Highlighting how the challenges raised by globalization - from environmental management to financial sector meltdowns - have encouraged the emergence of experts and networks as powerful actors in international governance, the contributions in this collection assess the methods and effectiveness of these new actors. Unlike other books that have focused on networks or experts, this volume brings these players together, showing how they interact and share the challenges of establishing legitimacy and justifying their power and influence. The collection shows how experts and networks function in different ways to address diverse problems across multiple borders. The reader is provided with a broader and deeper practical understanding of how informal authority actually operates, and of the nature of the relationship between different actors involved in policymaking. Through a range of case studies, the contributions in this collection explain how globalization is reshaping traditional forms of power and authority"--