Introduction
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 1-8
ISSN: 2328-9260
38 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 1-8
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 4, Heft 3-4, S. 323-325
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 159-161
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 1-3
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 3, Heft 3-4, S. 331-332
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 539-543
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 365-366
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 189-194
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 1-12
ISSN: 2328-9260
Abstract
In this introduction to the special issue of TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly on the theme "making transgender count," the authors delineate the senses in which trans people can count. On one hand, one makes trans count (in the sense of having its importance recognized) by counting it (making it visible through quantification). On the other hand, one makes (i.e., compels) trans count by forcing atypical configurations of identity into categories into which they do not quite fit—the proverbial square peg in a round hole. In this way, the imperative to be counted becomes another kind of normativizing violence that trans subjects can encounter and hence another problematic to be critically interrogated by the field of transgender studies. The tensions among what to count, whom to count, how to count, why to count, or whether to count or be counted at all are explored in this issue's articles. What makes the notion of trans* such a fecund point of departure for work in transgender studies is that the definitional lines of the concept are moving targets. That very instability frustrates the project of fixing embodied identities in time and space—a requisite operation for the potentially life-enhancing project of counting trans populations and better addressing their needs as well as for the necropolitical project of selecting certain members of the population for categorical exclusion as dysgenic. The essays in this issue do not resolve the tension between efforts to refine techniques of governmental reason and strategies of resistance, between attempts to sedentarize trans identities and movements that refuse such settling, or between universalizing imperatives to classify and local demands to reject incorporation into a global schematics of gender difference organized by male/female, man/woman, cis-/trans-, trans-/homo-, or white/color dichotomies. Some attempt to do both, while all ultimately fall on one side or the other of various problematics. Our goal in curating this issue has been less to gather a collection of articles that definitively settle these vexed questions than to stage a conversation in which the stakes of the game are made visible.
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 467-468
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 303-307
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, Band 1, Heft 1-2, S. 1-18
ISSN: 2328-9260
In: Social research: an international quarterly, Band 78, Heft 2, S. 557-582
ISSN: 0037-783X
In: The women's review of books, Band 20, Heft 5, S. 21
In: The women's review of books, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 15