Special Issue "Capability Approach and Multidimensional Well-being in High-income Countries"
In: Forum for social economics, Band 45, Heft 2-3, S. 111-119
ISSN: 1874-6381
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Forum for social economics, Band 45, Heft 2-3, S. 111-119
ISSN: 1874-6381
In: Forum for social economics, Band 45, Heft 2-3, S. 120-138
ISSN: 1874-6381
In: DIE Briefing Paper 5/2018
SSRN
Working paper
With the signing of the 2030 Agenda, the international community has committed to ending poverty in all its forms. This first Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) recognises poverty as a multidimensional phenomenon that goes beyond the simple lack of a sufficient amount of income. However, the way the SDG 1 and, in particular, Target 1.2 – "reduce … poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions" – are formulated poses challenges for its operationalisation.Which specific dimensions of poverty should a country focus on? How can we identify them? Is it possible to agree on a universal set of dimensions with which to compare poverty across several countries?Recently, significant advancements have been made in the measurement of multidimensional poverty; however, how dimensions of poverty are selected is often overlooked. Empirical studies have employed different approaches, ranging from a data-driven approach to the use of participatory methods or surveys to detect context-based dimensions. This Briefing Paper discusses the pros and cons of the existing approaches and argues in favour of a new one, called the Constitutional Approach. The central idea is that the constitution of a democratic country, together with its official interpretations, can be a valid source of ethically sound poverty dimensions.What is the value added of the Constitutional Approach? And what are the policy implications of adopting it?The approach is grounded on a clear understanding of what poverty is, rather than an ad hoc approximation of it based on data availability. Only with a clear definition can poverty be measured, and anti-poverty strategies adequately designed and implemented.By drawing on norm-governed national institutions that have shaped societal attitudes, the resulting list of dimensions is more legitimate and likely to be accepted and used by national policy-makers and endorsed by the public. The selecting of valuable societal dimensions is not just a technocratic issue but must be grounded in shared ethical values.The approach does not require the collection of additional information to understand which poverty dimension should be prioritised. However, one must consider that this approach is only suitable for democratic countries, whose constitutions: are the result of a broad-based participatory process, still enjoy wide consensus and recognise at least the principle of equality among all citizens.To compare multidimensional poverty at the global level, the approach could be extended by examining a core list of overlapping dimensions across several countries.Given the above strengths, the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), which has a vital role in the Multidimensional Poverty Peer Network, could recommend this approach to governments to track country progress in SDG 1.
BASE
With the signing of the 2030 Agenda, the international community has committed to ending poverty in all its forms. This first Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) recognises poverty as a multidimensional phenomenon that goes beyond the simple lack of a sufficient amount of income. However, the way the SDG 1 and, in particular, Target 1.2 – "reduce ?…? poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions" – are formulated poses challenges for its operationalisation. Which specific dimensions of poverty should a country focus on? How can we identify them? Is it possible to agree on a universal set of dimensions with which to compare poverty across several countries? Recently, significant advancements have been made in the measurement of multidimensional poverty; however, how dimensions of poverty are selected is often overlooked. Empirical studies have employed different approaches, ranging from a data-driven approach to the use of participatory methods or surveys to detect context-based dimensions. This Briefing Paper discusses the pros and cons of the existing approaches and argues in favour of a new one, called the Constitutional Approach. The central idea is that the constitution of a democratic country, together with its official interpretations, can be a valid source of ethically sound poverty dimensions. What is the value added of the Constitutional Approach? And what are the policy implications of adopting it? The approach is grounded on a clear understanding of what poverty is, rather than an ad hoc approximation of it based on data availability. Only with a clear definition can poverty be measured, and anti-poverty strategies adequately designed and implemented. By drawing on norm-governed national institutions that have shaped societal attitudes, the resulting list of dimensions is more legitimate and likely to be accepted and used by national policy-makers and endorsed by the public. The selecting of valuable societal dimensions is not just a technocratic issue but must be grounded in shared ethical values. The approach does not require the collection of additional information to understand which poverty dimension should be prioritised. However, one must consider that this approach is only suitable for democratic countries, whose constitutions: are the result of a broad-based participatory process, still enjoy wide consensus and recognise at least the principle of equality among all citizens. To compare multidimensional poverty at the global level, the approach could be extended by examining a core list of overlapping dimensions across several countries. Given the above strengths, the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), which has a vital role in the Multidimensional Poverty Peer Network, could recommend this approach to governments to track country progress in SDG 1.
BASE
In: Social indicators research: an international and interdisciplinary journal for quality-of-life measurement
ISSN: 1573-0921
The paper addresses the problem of justifying ethically sound dimensions of poverty or well-being for use in a multidimensional framework. We combine Sen's capability approach and Rawls' method of political constructivism and argue that the constitution and its interpretative practice can serve as an ethically suitable informational basis for selecting dimensions, under certain conditions. We illustrate our Constitutional Approach by deriving a set of well-being dimensions from an analysis of the Italian Constitution. We argue that this method is both an improvement on those used in the existing literature from the ethical point of view, and has a strong potential for providing the ethical basis of a conception of well-being for the public affairs of a pluralist society. In the final part, we elaborate on the implications for measuring well-being based on data, by ranking Italian regions in terms of well-being, and pointing out the differences in results produced by different methods.
World Affairs Online
The paper addresses the problem of justifying ethically sound dimensions of poverty or well-being for use in a multidimensional framework. We combine Sen's capability approach and Rawls' method of political constructivism and argue that the constitution and its interpretative practice can serve as an ethically suitable informational basis for selecting dimensions, under certain conditions. We illustrate our Constitutional Approach by deriving a set of well-being dimensions from an analysis of the Italian Constitution. We argue that this method is both an improvement on those used in the existing literature from the ethical point of view, and has a strong potential for providing the ethical basis of a conception of well-being for the public affairs of a pluralist society. In the final part, we elaborate on the implications for measuring well-being based on data, by ranking Italian regions in terms of well-being, and pointing out the differences in results produced by different methods.
BASE
In: The European journal of development research: journal of the European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), Band 27, Heft 1, S. 19-36
ISSN: 0957-8811
World Affairs Online
In: The European journal of development research, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 19-36
ISSN: 1743-9728
In: Ethics and social welfare, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 233-247
ISSN: 1749-6543
In: International journal of urban and regional research, Band 35, Heft 6, S. 1212-1238
ISSN: 1468-2427
In: International journal of urban and regional research: IJURR, Band 35, Heft 6, S. 1212-1239
ISSN: 0309-1317
In: International journal of urban and regional research, Band 35, Heft 6, S. 1212-1238
ISSN: 1468-2427
In: Journal of human development and capabilities: a multi-disciplinary journal for people-centered development, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 367-399
ISSN: 1945-2837
In: Mondes en développement, Band 139, Heft 3, S. 25-42
ISSN: 1782-1444
Cet article se focalise sur le rôle des Organisations de la Société Civile (OSC) dans la gouvernance de la lutte contre la pauvreté dans le Tiers-Monde. Les théories de l'innovation sociale et de "l'encapacitation" (empowerment) présentes dans l'analyse de la lutte contre la pauvreté sont mobilisées pour l'analyse de la gouvernance des réseaux de coopération internationale des OSC d'aide au développement localisées dans l'aire métropolitaine de Rome.