Suchergebnisse

Tímto, čtvrtým číslem ročníku 2022 končí po padesáti sedmi letech česká (a tím i slovenská) edice Mezinárodních vztahů (dále MV). Od následujícího ročníku bude časopis vycházet pouze v angličtině. Časopis prošel v posledních třech dekádách turbulentním vývojem, daným proměnou a vývojem disciplíny stejně jako měnícími se nároky na publikační praxi, který bychom v rámci tohoto fóra rádi reflektovali. Oslovili jsme proto jeho všechny bývalé šéfredaktory z posledních dvaceti let časopisu, zástupce a zástupkyně šéfredaktora nebo dlouholeté členy redakční rady a požádali je o zamyšlení se nad vývojem české edice časopisu a nad významem jejího ukončení.

Using the case of the Lebanese movement Hezbollah, the article deals with the phenomenon of the governance of non-state armed groups in failing states and the conditions for its emergence. It argues that one of the key requirements for the emergence and long-term preservation of a non-state armed group's authority is its fulfillment of functions usually associated with the state (such as the provision of security, public goods and services and the legitimation of its authority) that the failing state is not able to provide. The study specifically shows how Hezbollah is able to substitute for or complement the Lebanese state in each of its functions and consecutively use the wide network of its governance institutions for strengthening its political authority. As a result of Hezbollah's practices and strategies of governance, the forms of political control of the territory are being gradually changed and hybridized. Adapted from the source document.

1. Introduction: The Problematic Politics of 'hybrid warfare' -- 2. Liminal Insecurities: Crises, Geopolitics and the Logic of War -- 3. Formation: Emergence of the 'hybrid warfare' Assemblage in Czechia (2014–2016/17) -- 4. Politicisation, Institutionalisation, Internationalisation: The Czech 'hybrid warfare' Assemblage in 2017–2021 -- 5. Differentiation: Three Main Narratives of 'hybrid warfare' -- 6. Boundaries: Expertise, Authority and Contestation in the Czech 'hybrid warfare' Debate -- 7. Conclusion: Reclaiming Politics from the Logic of War.

What do we speak of when we speak of 'hybrid warfare', a notion that has become prominent in discussions of European security? The article shows that this question is difficult to answer, as the hybrid warfare discourse is not only vague, but also consists of multiple, and at times contradictory, narratives. While talking and writing about supposedly the same thing, participants in the hybrid warfare debate often suggest markedly different ideas about the precise nature and target of the threat, offer different responses and draw upon different expertise. Grounding our argument in critical scholarship on narratives, security knowledge and hybrid warfare, we build a framework for studying security narratives around the four elements of threat, threatened value, response and underlying knowledge. This framework is utilised in a case study of Czechia, a country that has played a pioneering and outsized role in European hybrid warfare debates. We identify three narratives of hybrid warfare – defence, counterinfluence and education – which present markedly different understandings of 'hybrid warfare', and ways to defend against it. Our intervention hopes to contribute to disentangling the contradictions of the hybrid warfare discourse, itself a necessary precondition for both sound state policy and an informed public debate.