Women in Natural Resource Management: Finding a More Balanced Perspective
In: Society and natural resources, Band 14, Heft 8, S. 645-656
ISSN: 1521-0723
21 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Society and natural resources, Band 14, Heft 8, S. 645-656
ISSN: 1521-0723
In: Social policy and society: SPS ; a journal of the Social Policy Association, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 115-125
ISSN: 1475-3073
This paper attempts to contribute to understandings of the role of resilience as a process enabling individuals to steer a positive course in their lives by drawing on longitudinal qualitative data collected from six case study individuals, drawn from a wider study of one hundred families over a seven-year period. It is shown how respondents construct their own life trajectories, specifically reflecting on the changes and challenges they face. Additionally, this work offers a policy perspective to the debate on resilience, examining the interplay between recent government initiatives and their potential role in fostering resilience.
In: CASE studies on poverty, place and policy
In: CASE studies on poverty, place and policy
Family life in areas of concentrated poverty and social problems is undermined by surrounding conditions. This timely book, by acclaimed author Anne Power and her team, is based on a unique longitudinal study of over 200 families interviewed annually over the last decade. It examines the initiatives introduced to help such families and the impacts on them, their future prospects and the implications for policy. Accessibly written and with clear data presentation, the book will have wide appeal to people who work with, live in and about families, children and low-income areas.
In: CASE studies on poverty, place and policy
Background: There is extensive literature on the methodology of evaluation research and the development and evaluation of complex interventions but little guidance on the formative stages before evaluation and how to work with partner organizations that wish to have their provision evaluated. It is important to be able to identify suitable projects for evaluation from a range of provision and describe the steps required, often with academic institutions working in partnership with external organizations, in order to set up an evaluation. However, research evaluating programs or interventions rarely discusses these stages. Objective: This study aimed to extend work on evaluability assessment and pre-evaluation planning by proposing an 8-Step Scoping Framework to enable the appraisal of multiple programs in order to identify interventions suitable for evaluation. We aimed to add to the literature on evaluability assessment and more recent evaluation guidance by describing the processes involved in working with partner organizations. Methods: This paper documents the steps required to identify multiple complex interventions suitable for process and outcome evaluation. The steps were developed using an iterative approach by working alongside staff in a local government organization, to build an evidence base to demonstrate which interventions improve children's outcomes. The process of identifying suitable programs for evaluation, thereby establishing the pre-evaluation steps, was tested using all Flying Start provision. Results: The 8-Step Scoping Framework was described using the example of the local government organization Flying Start to illustrate how each step contributes to finding projects suitable for process and outcome evaluation: (1) formulating overarching key questions that encompass all programs offered by an organization, (2) gaining an in-depth understanding of the work and provision of an organization and engaging staff, (3) completing a data template per project/program offered, (4) assessing the robustness/validity of data across all programs, (5) deciding on projects suitable for evaluation and those requiring additional data, (6) negotiating with chosen project leads, both within and outside the organization, (7) developing individual project evaluation protocols, and (8) applying for ethical approval from the university and partner organization. Conclusions: This paper describes the processes involved in identifying suitable projects for evaluation. It adds to the existing literature on the assessment of specific programs suitable for evaluation and guidance for conducting evaluations by establishing the formative steps required to identify suitable programs from a range of provision. This scoping framework particularly relates to academic partners and organizations tasked with delivering evidence-based services designed to meet local needs. The steps identified have been described in the context of early years provision but can be applied to a range of community-based evaluations, or more generally, to cases where an academic partner is working with external stakeholders to identify projects suitable for academic evaluation. ; gold OA article with cc licence
BASE
This poster gives a summary of the ACT Programme, the sites participating, diseases covered, numbers of patients, project timetable and the aim to provide a 'toolbox' of best practice. ACT programmes fall within five broad areas: CC of Management of Chronic and Multimorbid long-term conditions; Management of Chronic and Multimorbid long-term conditions with telehealth; Active patient/prevention/Education; Elderly at home; and Transitional care/post discharge. The number of patients recruited to ACT programmes varied considerably, from the small scale (e.g. Scotland's REACT project for those over 75 and Groningen's eDiabetes programme, both with 15-20 patients) to much larger scale (e.g. Lombardy's Chronic patients with 37,000). Most Programmes (14 out of 17) recruit people with chronic conditions and in some cases these are specified such as Congestive Heart Failure and Diabetes. Patients in recovery or rehabilitation were the second most cited group (12 out of 17). Patients in the preventative category were least likely to enter Programmes (5 out of 17). Some Programmes accept patients at multiple key stages. For example, Groningen's Effective Cardio Programme accepts patients at the preventative, newly diagnosed, disease management, recovery/rehabilitation, at risk, chronic and palliative stages, in addition to those on new medication. All Programmes reported clear lines of responsibility for the provision of patient care. General Practitioners/Primary Care took responsibility in nine of the 17 Programmes. Elsewhere, specialist nurses held responsibility (e.g. Groningen's Effective Cardio) or chest physicians (e.g. Groningen's asthma/COPD Telehealth service). Other Programmes apportioned responsibility at a broader level via a Programme Management Working Group and local managers (Basque Country's Active Patients) for example, or with a National diabetes standard and regional guidelines (Groningen's eDiabetes) or with defined care pathways (Scotland's three Programmes). Further details of the Organisational aspects of the participants in the ACT programme will be presented in the Poster ; European Union
BASE
In: Family futuresChildhood and poverty in urban neighbourhoods, S. 155-184
In: Family futuresChildhood and poverty in urban neighbourhoods, S. 87-121
In: Family futuresChildhood and poverty in urban neighbourhoods, S. 186-222
In: Family futuresChildhood and poverty in urban neighbourhoods, S. 53-85
In: Family futuresChildhood and poverty in urban neighbourhoods, S. 265-289
In: Family futuresChildhood and poverty in urban neighbourhoods, S. 123-153
In: Family futuresChildhood and poverty in urban neighbourhoods, S. 1-15
In: Family futuresChildhood and poverty in urban neighbourhoods, S. 224-263