Suchergebnisse

1. The neglect of citizens in the measurement of liberal democracy : an agenda for the application of public sphere theory to Central and Eastern Europe -- 2. Liberal institutions, illiberal democracy? The public spheres of Serbia and Bulgaria compared -- 3. Political pluralism in the mathematical or the philosophical sense? Comparing the range of disrouce in recent Serbian and Bulgarian political history -- 4. Publics and counterpublics in Serbia : public sphere pluralism in Nis -- 5. Disenchantment without coherence in Bulgaria : the absence of public sphere pluralism in Plovdiv.

Starting from the premise that citizens can only uphold the institutions of liberal democracy when they understand and identify with the principles enshrined in them, the author applies normative public sphere theory to the analysis of political discourse and everyday discussion in Serbia and Bulgaria. Moving beyond the narrow focus on institutions that currently prevails in studies of democratization, this book demonstrates the value of a more ethnographic and society-oriented approach.

Ethnicity is found in real-world contexts where non-ethnic forms of identification are available. This conclusion is drawn from an empirical study carried out in the multiethnic town of Kurdzhali in Southern Bulgaria, where members of the Bulgarian majority live alongside the Turkish minority. Drawing on the "everyday nationhood" agenda that aims to provide a methodological toolkit for the study of ethnicity/nationhood without overpredicting its importance, the study involved the collection of survey, interview, and ethnographic data. Against the expectations of some experienced scholars of the Central and Eastern Europe region, ethnic identity was found to be more salient for the majority Bulgarians than for the minority Turks. However, the ethnographic data revealed the importance of a rural–urban cleavage that was not predicted by the research design. On the basis of this finding, I argue that the "everyday nationhood" approach could be improved by including a complementary focus on non-ethnic attachments that have been emphasized by scholarship or journalism relevant to the given context. Rather than assuming the centrality of ethnicity, such an "everyday identifications" approach would start from the assumption that ethnic narratives of identity always have to compete with non-ethnic ones.

Ethnicity is found in real-world contexts where non-ethnic forms of identification are available. This conclusion is drawn from an empirical study carried out in the multiethnic town of Kurdzhali in southern Bulgaria, where members of the Bulgarian majority live alongside the Turkish minority. Drawing on the 'everyday nationhood' agenda that aims to provide a methodological toolkit for the study of ethnicity/nationhood without overpredicting its importance, the study involved the collection of survey, interview, and ethnographic data. Against the expectations of some experienced scholars of the Central and Eastern Europe region, ethnic identity was found to be more salient for the majority Bulgarians than for the minority Turks. However, the ethnographic data revealed the importance of a rural-urban cleavage that was not predicted by the research design. On the basis of this finding, I argue that the 'everyday nationhood' approach could be improved by including a complementary focus on non-ethnic attachments that have been emphasized by scholarship or journalism relevant to the given context. Rather than assuming the centrality of ethnicity, such an 'everyday identifications' approach would start from the assumption that ethnic narratives of identity always have to compete with non-ethnic ones. (Nationalities Papers)