By One Vote: The Disputed Presidential Election of 1876 – By Michael F. Holt
In: Presidential studies quarterly, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 649-651
ISSN: 0360-4918
23 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Presidential studies quarterly, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 649-651
ISSN: 0360-4918
In: Presidential studies quarterly: official publication of the Center for the Study of the Presidency, Band 41, Heft 3, S. 649-650
ISSN: 1741-5705
In: War in history, Band 8, Heft 4, S. 489-491
ISSN: 1477-0385
In: War in history, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 370-372
ISSN: 1477-0385
In: The journal of military history, Band 63, Heft 1, S. 165-168
ISSN: 0899-3718
In: The journal of military history, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 727-754
ISSN: 0899-3718
In: Armed forces & society, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 174-175
ISSN: 1556-0848
In: The journal of strategic studies, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 10-36
ISSN: 1743-937X
In: Armed forces & society, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 555-572
ISSN: 1556-0848
As an American volunteer colonel during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848), Alexander W. Doniphan played a leading role in the earliest experiences of the U.S. military government. Serving as an officer in the U.S. expedition that captured Santa Fe, New Mexico, in 1846, Doniphan was ordered to write a constitution and set of laws for the New Mexico Territory. Furthermore, Doniphan had to deal with the ethnically diverse population of the conquered lands. He negotiated a treaty with the Navajo tribe in hopes of establishing peaceful relations between the tribe and the United States. Other officers, both regulars and volunteers, later performed similar duties in the captured territory of California. Comprehensive works on military government point to Doniphan's actions as helping to set the example for U.S. military governments in other captured territories after the war with Spain in 1898 and into the twentieth century. Moreover, Doniphan was also involved in an incident that served as an important example of the difficulties of nineteenth century civil-military relations during wartime. Believing that he would need privately owned supplies while his expedition operated in enemy territory, Doniphan ordered goods to be commandeered for his soldiers' use. The owner of the supplies sued for compensation and his case proceeded all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court ruled that Doniphan and his subordinates had acted improperly in confiscating the supplies, thus forcing military officers to be aware that they could not take arbitrary actions even in the face of enemy armed forces in enemy territory.
In: The journal of strategic studies, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 10-36
ISSN: 0140-2390
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 555-572
ISSN: 0095-327X
In: Armed forces & society, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 160-162
ISSN: 1556-0848
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 504, Heft 1, S. 157-158
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 490, Heft 1, S. 225-226
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 467, Heft 1, S. 232-232
ISSN: 1552-3349