American-French private international law
In: Bilateral studies in private international law 2
42 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Bilateral studies in private international law 2
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 38, Heft 6, S. 1660-1662
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 38, Heft 5, S. 1445-1447
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 37, Heft 4, S. 790-809
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 653-655
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 91, Heft 3, S. 476-489
ISSN: 2161-7953
There is an abundant literature on the subject of state contract awards, including matters concerning recognition and enforcement, and related issues of sovereign immunity. For the most part, however, the studies that have been published tend to focus on spectacular situations involving bitter and protracted litigation in the aftermath of such well-known awards as those between the SEEE and Yugoslavia, SPP and Egypt, and LIAMCO and Libya.
In: American journal of international law, Band 91, Heft 3, S. 476-488
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 35, Heft 6, S. 1359-1381
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 35, Heft 5, S. 1159-1164
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 34, Heft 6, S. 1615-1634
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 88, Heft 2, S. 257-279
ISSN: 2161-7953
The decision of the United States Supreme Court in Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc. is an invitation to reassess the impact of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) upon public debt litigation. In contrast with other activities of foreign states, which have been the object of extensive and continuing litigation, barely two dozen cases involving public debt disputes have been reported since the FSIA took effect. Whether this situation is attributable to the care with which transnational loan documents are usually drafted or to some other reasons, including possibly the contemporary tendency to rely on debt rescheduling as a means of remedying difficult situations, is an interesting matter of speculation. Whatever the explanation for the relatively limited number of public debt cases, Weltover can be expected to have a decisive impact upon future litigation.
In: American journal of international law, Band 88, Heft 2, S. 257-279
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 31, Heft 5, S. 1220-1229
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 86, Heft 1, S. 138-142
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 85, Heft 4, S. 696-698
ISSN: 2161-7953
In 1978 a French company (Pipeline) and the National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC) entered into a contract (governed by Iranian law) for the supply and erection of gas pipeline installations linking certain Iranian cities. Apparently not paid for its services, Pipeline brought an action in France against NIGC. NIGC's plea of immunity was denied by the Court of Appeal of Versailles, whose decision was reversed by the Court of Cassation.