Suchergebnisse

Frontmatter. - Part I: Theoretical Foundations. -- Chapter 1: Reputation, Reputational Risk And Reputational Crisis In The Banking Industry: State Of The Art And Concepts For Improvements. - Chapter 2: Reputation, Reputational Crisis And Corporate Social Responsibility Of Banks: Measurement And Relationships -- Part II: Learning From Case Studies -- Chapter 3: The Libor Case And Focus On Barclays -- Chapter 4: The Case Study Of Goldman Sachs -- Chapter 5: The Case Study Of Lehman Brothers -- Chapter 6: Unicredit And Reputation: A Journey Integrating Stakeholders' Perceptions Into Business Planning And Strategies -- Chapter 7: Intesa Sanpaolo: A Case Study On Reputation Management And Its Relationship To Corporate Social Reputation -- Part III: From Experience To Knowledge -- Chapter 8: Managing Reputation: Reflections And Operational Suggestions.

PurposeBased on the agency and resource dependence theories, this study aims to investigate whether nomination committee (NC) characteristics could serve as key attributes for reducing environmental, social and governance (ESG) disputes and whether NC composition affects the appointment of ESG-friendly directors to the board.Design/methodology/approachThis study focuses on a sample of 30 global systemically important banks from 2015 to 2021. The authors estimate panel data models with fixed effects, clustering heteroskedastic standard errors at the bank level to account for the serial correlation of the dependent variables for each bank.FindingsBanks' exposure to ESG controversies can be reduced when NC members have specific skills, in particular when at least one member of this committee also belongs to the sustainability committee and is a foreign director. Moreover, banks' ESG disputes decrease when the NC members are younger, while the share of independent NC members has a negative impact. Finally, a positive influence of NC composition and its members' features as well as the appointment of ESG-friendly directors on the board is found.Originality/valueThe findings are particularly useful during periods such as the current one, when there is growing attention to both banks' corporate governance, the subcommittees' role and functioning and social and environmental issues. This study shows that the NC is important in reducing the likelihood of banks incurring ESG disputes and in appointing more ESG-friendly directors. NC effective functioning and its members' qualities serve as a key attribute for fulfilling objective assessment and improving board effectiveness.

AbstractThe relationships between sustainable behavior, firm reputation, and economic performance are significant issues that continue to become more important. Corporate reputation has important implications for economic performance while corporate social responsibility engagement is considered a key determinant of reputation. The aim of this study is to empirically test such relationships regarding the banking sector and for the sub‐prime crisis period (2008–2012). We apply our hypothesis to 75 large international banks using Reputation Institute and ASSET4 data and adopting a multiple econometric approach. Our initial results are encouraging and consistent with the existing literature: bank reputation is positively related to accounting performance and is negatively related to leverage and riskiness profiles. However, while a positive relationship between reputation and social performance exists, relationships between reputation, corporate governance, and environmental performance are always negative. We discuss these results by identifying related causes and by presenting avenues for future research. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

AbstractThis study aims to explore the impact of corporate social performance (CSP) on firm risk, and it proposes the moderating role of corporate governance (CG) among this relationship. Although the literature on corporate social responsibility is extensive, there is still a lack of knowledge about how CSP influences firm risks, as well as the role of CG in this relationship. To fill this gap, we have empirically tested the impact of CSP on a firm's risk through a longitudinal analysis on S&P 500 firms from 2015 to 2019. Results show a significant negative relationship between CSP and firm risks, which is positively moderated by CG mechanisms. Our study contributes to the empirical research on corporate social responsibility and it provides insights for managerial decisions to encourage managers to pursue environmental and social practices that reduce the firm risk, with positive impacts on the firm value.