Reforming the future, where is the academy going?
In: Social science journal: official journal of the Western Social Science Association, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 325-332
ISSN: 0362-3319
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Social science journal: official journal of the Western Social Science Association, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 325-332
ISSN: 0362-3319
In: Social science journal: official journal of the Western Social Science Association, Band 34, Heft 4, S. 549-555
ISSN: 0362-3319
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 454, S. 139-149
ISSN: 0002-7162
One of the major fallacies of Western civilization, according to Alfred North Whitehead,' was the propensity of Western thinkers to assume that ideas generated within their intellectual landscape were indicative of reality itself. Although some phases of Western science, notably physics and philosophy, have transcended their parochial origins, aspects of the old medieval synthesis still remain in the Western worldview. The gradual fragmentation of the old categories of natural history and theology into the isolated sciences and disciplines of today has produced a myriad of separate bodies of knowledge complete with their professional priesthoods and has allowed considerable slippage in the ability of the Western scientific paradigm to generate adequate explanations for the multitude of problems we face as a society.
BASE
"Federal Indian law. is a loosely related collection of past and present acts of Congress, treaties and agreements, executive orders, administrative rulings, and judicial opinions, connected only by the fact that law in some form has been applied haphazardly to American Indians over the course of several centuries. Indians in their tribal relation and Indian tribes in their relation to the federal government hang suspended in a legal wonderland." In this book, two prominent scholars of American Indian law and politics undertake a full historical examination of the relationship between Indians and the United States Constitution that explains the present state of confusion and inconsistent application in U.S. Indian law. The authors examine all sections of the Constitution that explicitly and implicitly apply to Indians and discuss how they have been interpreted and applied from the early republic up to the present. They convincingly argue that the Constitution does not provide any legal rights for American Indians and that the treaty-making process should govern relations between Indian nations and the federal government. ; https://scholarship.richmond.edu/bookshelf/1331/thumbnail.jpg
BASE