Der amerikanische Rückzug vom Iran-Deal: das letzte "hurray" einer scheiternden Supermacht?
In: PRIF Blog
30 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: PRIF Blog
World Affairs Online
In: PRIF Blog
World Affairs Online
In: Friedensgutachten, S. 69-81
ISSN: 0932-7983
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online
In: European journal of international relations, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 809-832
ISSN: 1460-3713
Persistent tensions between the international norm of state sovereignty and emerging human rights norms, including the Responsibility to Protect and the protection of civilians during international peacekeeping, raise the question of when and under what circumstances local and regional actors are more likely to respect global norms. These tensions are particularly stark in Africa. On the one hand, African states and regional organizations were among the first proponents of liberal protection norms in the non-Western world. On the other hand, many African leaders view state sovereignty as indispensable. Building on established empirical justice research in neighboring fields, this article makes an important contribution to the literature by demonstrating that African states are more likely to accept interventionist human rights norms when standards of procedural justice have been observed. The article demonstrates the relevance of procedural justice by examining the puzzle of divergent African reactions to two similar instances of regime change in Libya and the Ivory Coast that were enforced by extra-continental actors in the name of global protection norms.
World Affairs Online
In: European journal of international relations, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 809-832
ISSN: 1460-3713
Persistent tensions between the international norm of state sovereignty and emerging human rights norms, including the Responsibility to Protect and the protection of civilians during international peacekeeping, raise the question of when and under what circumstances local and regional actors are more likely to respect global norms. These tensions are particularly stark in Africa. On the one hand, African states and regional organizations were among the first proponents of liberal protection norms in the non-Western world. On the other hand, many African leaders view state sovereignty as indispensable. Building on established empirical justice research in neighboring fields, this article makes an important contribution to the literature by demonstrating that African states are more likely to accept interventionist human rights norms when standards of procedural justice have been observed. The article demonstrates the relevance of procedural justice by examining the puzzle of divergent African reactions to two similar instances of regime change in Libya and the Ivory Coast that were enforced by extra-continental actors in the name of global protection norms.
In: Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik: ZFAS, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 89-91
ISSN: 1866-2196
In: Friedensgutachten, S. 75-86
ISSN: 0932-7983
World Affairs Online
In: European security, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 449-465
ISSN: 1746-1545
In: Cambridge review of international affairs, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 362-380
ISSN: 1474-449X
In: SPW: Zeitschrift für sozialistische Politik und Wirtschaft, Heft 203, S. 30-35
ISSN: 0170-4613
In: European security: ES, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 449-465
ISSN: 0966-2839
In: Cambridge review of international affairs, Band 27, Heft 2, S. 362-380
ISSN: 0955-7571
In: African security, Band 6, Heft 3-4, S. 276-296
ISSN: 1939-2214