The effect of different historical emissions datasets on emission targets of the sectoral mitigation approach Triptych
In: Climate policy, Band 10, Heft 6, S. 684-704
ISSN: 1752-7457
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Climate policy, Band 10, Heft 6, S. 684-704
ISSN: 1752-7457
In: Climate policy, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 465-480
ISSN: 1752-7457
In: Climate policy, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 111-117
ISSN: 1752-7457
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 33, S. 308-319
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 14, Heft 6, S. 615-627
ISSN: 1462-9011
ABSTRACTOne of the most fundamental questions surrounding the new Paris Agreement is whether countries? proposals to reduce GHG emissions after 2020 are equally ambitious, considering differences in circumstances between countries. We review a variety of approaches to assess the ambition of the GHG emission reduction proposals by countries. The approaches are applied illustratively to the mitigation part of the post-2020 climate proposals (nationally determined contributions, or NDCs) by China, the EU, and the US. The analysis reveals several clear trends, even though the results differ per individual assessment approach. We recommend that such a comprehensive ambition assessment framework, employing a large variety of approaches, is used in the future to capture a wide spectrum of perspectives on ambition.POLICY RELEVANCEAssessing the ambition of the national climate proposals is particularly important as the Paris Agreement asks for regular reviews of national contributions, keeping in mind that countries raise their ambition over time. Such an assessment will be an important part of the regular global stocktake that will take place every five years, starting with a ?light? version in 2018. However, comprehensive methods to assess the proposals are lacking. This article provides such a comprehensive assessment framework.
BASE
In: Climate policy, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 425-441
ISSN: 1752-7457
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 185-203
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 85-103
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 71, S. 30-40
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 12, Heft 7, S. 832-843
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 28-39
ISSN: 1462-9011
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of climate policy, it is important to understand emission trends and policies at the national level. The 2015 Paris Agreement includes (Intended) Nationally Determined Contributions, so-called (I)NDCs, outlining the contribution of different Parties to the overall target of the agreement to limit global mean temperature increase to well below 2 °C. Here, we assess emission trajectories and the energy system transition of 11 major economies (in the remainder: countries) projected by integrated assessment models (IAMs) for baseline and cost-optimal 450 ppm CO2 eq mitigation scenarios and compare the results with the (I)NDCs. Limiting global temperature increase to below 2 °C implies a substantial reduction of the estimated available carbon budget for each country. The national carbon budgets between 2010 and 2100 showed reductions between the baseline and the 2 °C consistent mitigation scenario ranging from 52% in South Korea to 95% in Brazil. While in the baseline scenario, the share of low-carbon primary energy sources is projected to remain around 15% (with Brazil being a notable exception, reaching 30%); in the mitigation scenarios, the share of low-carbon energy is projected to increase to over 50% in 2050 in nearly all countries, with the EU, Japan and Canada reaching the largest shares. Comparison with the (I)NDCs shows that in Brazil, Canada, the EU, Mexico (conditional target), South Korea and the USA, the emission reduction targets of the NDCs are closer to the mitigation requirement of the 2 °C scenario; in other countries, however, there is still a large gap. The national detail of the indicators adds to the literature on low-carbon emission pathways, assists the assessment of the Paris Agreement and provides support to national policymakers to identify focus areas for climate policy in the coming years.
BASE
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 51, S. 77-87
ISSN: 1462-9011