Search results

How professionalization and scholarly "rigor" made social scientists increasingly irrelevant to US national security policyTo mobilize America's intellectual resources to meet the security challenges of the post-9/11 world, US Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates observed that "we must again embrace eggheads and ideas." But the gap between national security policymakers and international relations scholars has become a chasm. In Cult of the Irrelevant, Michael Desch traces the history of the relationship between the Beltway and the Ivory Tower from World War I to the present day. Recounting key "Golden Age" academic strategists such as Thomas Schelling and Walt Rostow, Desch's narrative shows that social science research became most oriented toward practical problem-solving during times of war and that scholars returned to less relevant work during peacetime. Social science disciplines like political science rewarded work that was methodologically sophisticated over scholarship that engaged with the messy realities of national security policy, and academic culture increasingly turned away from the job of solving real-world problems. In the name of scientific objectivity, academics today frequently engage only in basic research that they hope will somehow trickle down to policymakers. Drawing on the lessons of this history as well as a unique survey of current and former national security policymakers, Desch offers concrete recommendations for scholars who want to shape government work. The result is a rich intellectual history and an essential wake-up call to a field that has lost its way

Machine generated contents note:PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS IN A COMPARATIVE CONTEXT --One.Historical Consciousness, Realism, and Public Intellectuals in American Society /Jeremi Suri --Two.American Public Intellectuals and the Early Cold War, or, Mad about Henry Wallace /Andrew J. Bacevich --Three.Public Intellectual in China /Willy Lam --Four.Intellectuals and Intelligentsia in Latin America /Enrique Krauze --Five.Intellectual, Culture, and the State: The Experiences and Failures of Enlightenment in the Arab World /Ahmad S. Moussalli --PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS ACROSS DISCIPLINES --Six.Philosopher as Public Intellectual /Patrick Baert --Seven.Economist as ...? The Public Square and Economists /J. Bradford Delong --Eight.Of Mirrors and Media: The Blogger as Public Intellectual /Paul Horwitz --Nine.Science in the Crosshairs: The Public Role of Science and Scientists /Kenneth R. Miller --Ten.Diplomats as Intellectuals: An Unlikely Combination /Gilles Andreani --REFLECTIONS --Eleven.Reckless Minds: Caveat Lector /Mark Lilla --Twelve.Caveat Lilla: On Public Intellectualism in the Twenty-First Century /Michael Zuckert --Thirteen.Public Intellectual as Teacher and Students as Public: Declining and Falling Apart /Patrick J. Deneen --Fourteen.Ethical Imperative for Some Scholars to Be Public Intellectuals and for the Rest to Let Them Do So /Michael C. Desch --Concluding Thoughts: Toward a Typology of Public Intellectuals /Vittorio Hosle.

"Above the politics and ideological battles of Washington, D.C., is a committee that meets behind locked doors and leaves its paper trail in classified files. The President's Intelligence Advisory Board (PIAB) is one of the most secretive and potentially influential segments of the U.S. intelligence community. Established in 1956, the PIAB advises the president about intelligence collection, analysis, and estimates, and about the legality of foreign intelligence activities. Privileged and Confidential: The Secret History of the President's Intelligence Advisory Board is the first and only study of the PIAB. Foreign policy veterans Kenneth Michael Absher, Michael C. Desch, and Roman Popadiuk trace the board's history from Eisenhower through Obama and evaluate its effectiveness under each president. Created to be an independent panel of nonpartisan experts, the PIAB has become increasingly susceptible to politics in recent years and has lost some of its influence. Absher, Desch, and Popadiuk, however, clearly demonstrate the board's potential to offer a unique and valuable perspective on intelligence issues. Privileged and Confidential not only illuminates a little-known element of U.S. intelligence operations but also offers suggestions for enhancing a critical executive function."--Project Muse