Use of the Informed Consent Model in the Provision of Cross-Sex Hormone Therapy: A Survey of the Practices of Selected Clinics
In: The international journal of transgenderism: IJT, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 140-146
ISSN: 1434-4599
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The international journal of transgenderism: IJT, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 140-146
ISSN: 1434-4599
In: Journal of the International AIDS Society, Band 19, Heft 3S2
ISSN: 1758-2652
IntroductionStudies have shown that transgender women (TGW) are disproportionately affected by HIV, with an estimated HIV prevalence of 19.1% among TGW worldwide. After receiving a diagnosis, HIV‐positive TGW have challenges accessing effective HIV treatment, as demonstrated by lower rates of virologic suppression and higher HIV‐related mortality. These adverse HIV outcomes have been attributed to the multiple sociocultural and structural barriers that negatively affect their engagement within the HIV care continuum. Guidelines for feminizing hormonal therapy among TGW recommend combinations of oestrogens and androgen blockers. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that certain antiretroviral therapy (ART) agents, such as protease inhibitors (PIs), non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and cobicistat, interact with ethinyl estradiol, the key oestrogen component of oral contraceptives (OCPs). The goal of this article is to provide an overview of hormonal regimens used by TGW, to summarize the known drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) between feminizing hormonal regimens and ART, and to provide clinical care recommendations.MethodsThe authors identified English language articles examining DDIs between oestrogen therapy, androgen blockers and ART published between 1995 and 2015 using PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and EBSCOhost.Results and DiscussionPublished articles predominantly addressed interactions between ethinyl estradiol and NNRTIs and PIs. No studies examined interactions between ART and the types and doses of oestrogens found in feminizing regimens. DDIs that may have the potential to result in loss of virologic suppression included ethinyl estradiol and amprenavir, unboosted fosamprenavir and stavudine. No clinically significant DDIs were noted with other anti‐retroviral agents or androgen blockersConclusionsThere are insufficient data to address DDIs between ART and feminizing hormone regimens used by TGW. There is an urgent need for further research in this area, specifically pharmacokinetic studies to study the direction and degree of interactions between oral, injectable and transdermal estradiol and ART. Clinicians need to be vigilant about possible interactions and monitor hormone levels if concerns arise. More research is also needed on the provision of hormone therapy and gender‐affirming care on the long‐term health outcomes of HIV‐positive TGW.
In: Journal of the International AIDS Society, Band 19, Heft 7S6
ISSN: 1758-2652
IntroductionGlobally, transgender ("trans") women are one of the key populations most disproportionately impacted by HIV. Pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is the newest and most promising biomedical HIV prevention intervention to date. This paper reviews relevant literature to describe the current state of the science and describes the potential role of PrEP among trans women, including a discussion of unique considerations for maximizing the impact of PrEP for this vulnerable population.MethodsAvailable information, including but not limited to existing scientific literature, about trans women and PrEP was reviewed and critiqued based on author expertise, including PrEP clinical trials and rollout.ResultsTo date, PrEP demonstration projects and clinical trials have largely excluded trans women, or have not included them in a meaningful way. Data collection strategies that fail to identify trans women in clinical trials and research further limit the ability to draw conclusions about trans women's unique needs and devise strategies to meet them. Gender‐affirming providers and clinic environments are essential components of any sexual health programme that aims to serve trans women, as they will largely avoid settings that may result in stigmatizing encounters and threats to their identities. While there is currently no evidence to suggest drug‐drug interactions between PrEP and commonly used feminizing hormone regimens, community concerns about potential interactions may limit interest in and uptake of PrEP among trans women.ConclusionsIn scaling up PrEP for trans women, it is essential to engage trans communities, utilize trans‐inclusive research and marketing strategies and identify and/or train healthcare providers to provide gender‐affirming healthcare to trans women, including transition‐related care such as hormone provision. PrEP implementation guidelines must consider and address trans women's unique barriers and facilitators to uptake and adherence.
In: International journal of transgender health: IJTH, Band 23, Heft 4, S. 392-408
ISSN: 2689-5269
In: The international journal of transgenderism: IJT, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 1-6
ISSN: 1434-4599