Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
27 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of economic history, Band 79, Heft 3, S. 708-735
ISSN: 1471-6372
Puerto Rico became an American colony in 1898, achieving self-rule after the Great Depression. The standard view is that Puerto Rican living standards stagnated before the policy changes of the New Deal and it has lost ground on the mainland since the early 1970s. I show these claims are mistaken. Using a new GDP index for 1900 to 1940, I show that income per capita grew at impressive rates during direct American rule and Puerto Rico escaped the worst ravages of the Great Depression. In addition, I find the recent growth slowdown is partly a statistical artifact.
In: University of Queensland Law Journal, 27 1: 71-89, 2008
SSRN
In: Health Capital and Sustainable Socioeconomic Development; Public Administration and Public Policy
In: J Devereux, B Cavanagh, 'Reconsidering Summary Discipline Law' (2014) 32 (2) University of Queensland Law Journal 295-310
SSRN
In: Tort Law Review, 21 3: 151-160, 2013
SSRN
In: The journal of economic history, Band 72, Heft 1, S. 104-132
ISSN: 1471-6372
We examine Cuban GDP over time and across space. We find that Cuba was once a prosperous middle-income economy. On the eve of the revolution, incomes were 50 to 60 percent of European levels. They were among the highest in Latin America at about 30 percent of the United States. In relative terms, Cuba was richer earlier on. Income per capita during the 1920s was in striking distance of Western Europe and the Southern United States. After the revolution, Cuba slipped down the world income distribution. Current levels of income per capita appear below their pre-revolutionary peaks.
In: The journal of economic history, Band 64, Heft 3, S. 879-891
ISSN: 1471-6372
In the September 2003 issue of this JOURNAL, we provided benchmark comparisons of U.K./U.S. income from 1870 to 1990. In contrast to long-span projections from Angus Maddison and others, our estimates show the United States leading from 1870 in terms of income per capita and output per worker. In a 12-page comment that accompanies our article, Professor Stephen Broadberry criticizes our work on three grounds. First, he charges our estimates are inconsistent with his U.K./U.S. sectoral productivity comparisons. Second, he chastises us on the grounds that our price benchmarks conflict with standard U.S. and U.K. price indices. Finally, he queries our nominal GDP estimates.
In: The journal of economic history, Band 63, Heft 3
ISSN: 1471-6372
In: Journal of development economics, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 81-99
ISSN: 0304-3878
In: Journal of development economics, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 81-99
ISSN: 0304-3878
The authors estimate the effects of commercial policy and changes in the external terms of trade on the real exchange rate of four Latin American economies using data on internal relative prices. They find that the greater the elasticity of the non-traded price level with respect to the price of importables, the larger is the real exchange rate effect of import restriction, but the smaller is the real exchange rate effect of changes in the external terms of trade. (DSE/DÜI)
World Affairs Online
In: Economica, Band 60, Heft 239, S. 295
In: Comparative economic studies, Band 59, Heft 3, S. 261-310
ISSN: 1478-3320
In: Comparative Economic Studies, Band 59, Heft 3
SSRN
In: Bank of Greece Working Paper No. 135
SSRN