Implicit bicultural identity among Mexican American and Asian American college students
In: Peace research abstracts journal, Volume 44, Issue 3, p. 381
ISSN: 0031-3599
3 results
Sort by:
In: Peace research abstracts journal, Volume 44, Issue 3, p. 381
ISSN: 0031-3599
Background: The antifungal drug itraconazole exerts in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2 in Vero and human Caco-2 cells. Preclinical and clinical studies are required to investigate if itraconazole is effective for the treatment and/or prevention of COVID-19.Methods: Due to the initial absence of preclinical models, the effect of itraconazole was explored in a clinical, proof-of-concept, open-label, single-center study, in which hospitalized COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to standard of care with or without itraconazole. Primary outcome was the cumulative score of the clinical status until day 15 based on the 7-point ordinal scale of the World Health Organization. In parallel, itraconazole was evaluated in a newly established hamster model of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission, as soon as the model was validated.Findings: In the hamster acute infection model, itraconazole did not reduce viral load in lungs, stools or ileum, despite adequate plasma and lung drug concentrations. In the transmission model, itraconazole failed to prevent viral transmission. The clinical trial was prematurely discontinued after evaluation of the preclinical studies and because an interim analysis showed no signal for a more favorable outcome with itraconazole: mean cumulative score of the clinical status 49 vs 47, ratio of geometric means 1.01 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.19) for itraconazole vs standard of care.Interpretation: Despite in vitro activity, itraconazole was not effective in a preclinical COVID-19 hamster model. This prompted the premature termination of the proof-of-concept clinical study. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. ; This project has received funding from the Covid-19-Fund KU Leuven / University Hospitals Leuven, the COVID-19 call of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) (grant G0G4820N), the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant 101003627, Swift COronavirus therapeutics REsponse project) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant INV-00636). LLi is member of the Institute of Tropical Medicine's Outbreak Research Team which is financially supported by the Department of Economy, Science and Innovation (EWI) of the Flemish government. BV is supported by a research grant of the Frans Van de Werf Fund for Clinical Cardiovascular Research. P. Verhamme, TV, P. Vermeersch are senior clinical investigators of the FWO. We thank Johnson & Johnson for determining drug concentrations in hamster samples and for providing guidance on the dosing. We thank Lindsey Bervoets, Carolien De Keyzer, Elke Maas and Jasper Rymentants for the technical support with the animal experiments.
BASE
We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance (p <.05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p <.0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely highpowered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen's ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than.20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above.10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied.
BASE