Suchergebnisse

Internet connectivity is essential for prosperity and development in all societies. This policy-focused report is the culmination of a qualitative study of digital connectivity and telecommunications in rural Far North Queensland (FNQ). In particular, the research investigated the lived experience of digital inclusion – a combination of internet access, affordability of technology, and digital ability - in agricultural households and communities the Northern Gulf region. The Australian Digital Inclusion Index (ADII) shows that North West Queensland (which takes in the Gulf Savannah) is one of Australia's least digitally included regions. The ADII further suggests that farmers and farm managers tend to score more poorly in the Index than others in comparable circumstances, particularly on the digital ability sub-index. This research aimed to unpack how these quantitative insights 'play out' in the context of rural FNQ, thereby shedding light on the nuanced and context-specific factors that impact digital participation of farming households and communities. In 2018, with funding from the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN), James Cook University partnered with Northern Gulf Resource Management Group to complete three week-long data fieldtrips to towns and properties across the Gulf Savannah. The lead researcher, Dr Amber Marshall, attended and presented at rural events, undertook interviews and focus groups, and conducted three case studies of cattle properties. These activities provided real world context for the policy analysis undertaken in this report. This cross-level, cross-sector policy analysis was undertaken to determine the laws and strategies that impact rural and remote internet access, reliability and affordability, along with digital ability and capacity building frameworks. The findings (11 in total) address issues ranging from barriers to connection (such as lack of continuity in the telecommunications network); social factors impacting digital resource allocation and consumption (such as intergenerational and gender-related circumstances); threats to agricultural industry (such as the need to preserve product integrity and to attract/train workers); and consumer-level insights (such as population heterogeneity and expectations of fairness). These comprehensive findings give rise to several recommendations for federal, state and local governments in partnership with community and industry organisations. These include: 1. Improve basic infrastructure and services at local scales, including diversifying service plans to meet specific needs 2. Embrace alternative connectivity infrastructure, whereby state and federal government partners with the regions to collaboratively fill infrastructure and service gaps 3. Redefine affordability at the federal level, to ensure the true cost of being connected in the bush is realised and accommodated 4. Deliver targeted digital capability building programs to address many farmers' thirst for digital skills 5. Develop digital mentors, support brokers and upskill remote workers, to help ensure digital skills programs are relevant and rolled out in situ 6. Empower rural local governments and community organisations to plan and deliver through strategic linkages with the broader national digital inclusion ecosystem 7. Adopt principles for a holistic approach to digital inclusion policy that recognises the critical role of digital capacity building to social and economic development in rural and agricultural Australia. This final recommendation essentially underpins achievement of the preceding recommendations.

In this essay we argue that a Deweyan experience economy will best support the higher education (HE) sector in the future, and we draw a contrast between that economy and the sector's current focus on informational concerns, as expressed by the recent rush to Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and other mass online informational offerings. We base our argument on current developments in music education and music technology that we see as being preemptive of wider trends. We use examples from a three-year study of online and offline music pedagogies and outline a four-year experiment in developing a pedagogical experience economy to illustrate a theoretical position informed by John Dewey's theory of experience, Pierre Bourdieu's theory of habitus and capital, and recent work in economic geography on epistemic communities. We argue further that the future of the HE sector is local rather than global, experiential rather than informational, and that therefore a continued informational approach to the future of HE risks undermining the sector.

While the Australian Government's Developing Northern Australia (NA) strategy sets ambitious targets for major essential infrastructure such as roads and water, relatively less attention has been paid how telecommunications and internet needs will be met to ensure NA is competitive and livable in the digital age. According to the Australian Digital Inclusion Index, Northern Australians are far less digitally included that their southern counterparts across three sub-indices: internet access, affordability and digital ability. We sought to understand the lived experience of digital exclusion in rural and remote agricultural communities in North West Queensland. In partnership with Northern Gulf Resource Management Group, and with funding from the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network, we undertook ethnographic interviews, focus groups and participant observation at rural events and on cattle properties in the Northern Gulf region. The findings represent a rich understanding of the specific, unique factors that contribute to low levels of digital inclusion in rural and remote areas, along with impacts for agricultural families and communities. Regarding access, rural residents said that current services were insufficient to serve their families' growing education and social needs, or to maintain, grow or expand their businesses, citing issues with speed, data caps, intermittent connections and poor customer service. On the other hand, smaller households in remote areas with relatively modest internet were reasonably satisfied they could complete essential activities online. Regarding affordability, participants on the cusp of several unreliable mobile and internet services tend to "layer up" their devices and plans to ensure they have access when and where they need, which compounds the cost of being connected. Finally, digital ability varies substantially across generations and genders in these households and communities, resulting in diverse unmet needs that require nuanced solutions. We conclude the paper with implications of these findings, including questioning what equitable digital inclusion should look like in sparsely populated areas, a need to redefine our understanding of affordability, and an urgent call for place-based digital ability programs in agricultural Australia.