This paper discusses the issue of Sustainable Development (SD) in countries with abundant natural resources with the aim to construct a Sustainability Index of Mining Countries (SIMC) based on the Hartwick's (1977) weak sustainability theoretical framework and the Brundtland et al. (1987) SD's vision. The specific studies on mining and Top down/ Bottom-up approach allow us to identify five dimensions of sustainability of mining countries namely an economic dimension, a social dimension, an environmental dimension, a transverse dimension and a dimension involving governance, political and institutional issues. Each dimension is declined into measurable indicators, and then, the indicators are weighted and aggregated. An implementation of the constructed tool with Burkina Faso and Niger data reveals a dichotomy between perceived rents and development indicators. A sensitivity and robustness analysis of the SIMC with other development indicators confirms the strength of the tool.
This paper discusses the issue of Sustainable Development (SD) in countries with abundant natural resources with the aim to construct a Sustainability Index of Mining Countries (SIMC) based on the Hartwick's (1977) weak sustainability theoretical framework and the Brundtland et al. (1987) SD's vision. The specific studies on mining and Top down/ Bottom-up approach allow us to identify five dimensions of sustainability of mining countries namely an economic dimension, a social dimension, an environmental dimension, a transverse dimension and a dimension involving governance, political and institutional issues. Each dimension is declined into measurable indicators, and then, the indicators are weighted and aggregated. An implementation of the constructed tool with Burkina Faso and Niger data reveals a dichotomy between perceived rents and development indicators. A sensitivity and robustness analysis of the SIMC with other development indicators confirms the strength of the tool.
This paper discusses the issue of Sustainable Development (SD) in countries with abundant natural resources with the aim to construct a Sustainability Index of Mining Countries (SIMC) based on the Hartwick's (1977) weak sustainability theoretical framework and the Brundtland et al. (1987) SD's vision. The specific studies on mining and Top down/ Bottom-up approach allow us to identify five dimensions of sustainability of mining countries namely an economic dimension, a social dimension, an environmental dimension, a transverse dimension and a dimension involving governance, political and institutional issues. Each dimension is declined into measurable indicators, and then, the indicators are weighted and aggregated. An implementation of the constructed tool with Burkina Faso and Niger data reveals a dichotomy between perceived rents and development indicators. A sensitivity and robustness analysis of the SIMC with other development indicators confirms the strength of the tool.
The Composite Indices (CI) are essential for policy-makers. They can be used to guide public policy. The same tools are used to evaluate the performance of public equities. However, they are subject to debate, as there are no standard rules for their construction. This paper discusses the methodological issues in the development of CI. It illustrates them by building a simple sustainable development index for 15 countries. Following the basic steps, the results obtained by the arithmetic mean show that in general, high-income countries, except the USA, have a higher 0.7 index. Emerging countries are the least sustainable of the sample, the developing countries are in an intermediate position. The geometric method provides mixed results. With this method, it is the emerging economies that become leaders in the standings and rich countries, except Australia, saw their index to deteriorate sharply. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the scores and rankings of countries are sensitive to the methods used. It confirms the uniqueness of the BOD method. The uncertainty weighting methodologies ranges from 1.27% to 95.16% in developing countries and emerging countries against 23% on average for the developed countries. ; Les Indices Composites (IC) sont indispensables pour les décideurs publics. Ils peuvent servir à orienter les politiques publiques. Les mêmes outils sont utilisés pour évaluer les performances des actions publiques. Cependant, ils sont sujets à débats tant il n'existe pas de règles standard pour leur construction. Cet article discute des aspects méthodologiques dans l'élaboration des IC. IL les illustre en construisant un indicateur simple de Développement Durable pour 15 pays. En suivant les étapes essentielles, les résultats obtenus par la moyenne arithmétique montrent que dans l'ensemble, les pays à revenus élevés, exception faite des USA, ont un IDD supérieur 0,7. Les pays émergents sont les moins soutenables de l'échantillon, les PED étant dans une position intermédiaire. La méthode géométrique ...
The Composite Indices (CI) are essential for policy-makers. They can be used to guide public policy. The same tools are used to evaluate the performance of public equities. However, they are subject to debate, as there are no standard rules for their construction. This paper discusses the methodological issues in the development of CI. It illustrates them by building a simple sustainable development index for 15 countries. Following the basic steps, the results obtained by the arithmetic mean show that in general, high-income countries, except the USA, have a higher 0.7 index. Emerging countries are the least sustainable of the sample, the developing countries are in an intermediate position. The geometric method provides mixed results. With this method, it is the emerging economies that become leaders in the standings and rich countries, except Australia, saw their index to deteriorate sharply. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the scores and rankings of countries are sensitive to the methods used. It confirms the uniqueness of the BOD method. The uncertainty weighting methodologies ranges from 1.27% to 95.16% in developing countries and emerging countries against 23% on average for the developed countries. ; Les Indices Composites (IC) sont indispensables pour les décideurs publics. Ils peuvent servir à orienter les politiques publiques. Les mêmes outils sont utilisés pour évaluer les performances des actions publiques. Cependant, ils sont sujets à débats tant il n'existe pas de règles standard pour leur construction. Cet article discute des aspects méthodologiques dans l'élaboration des IC. IL les illustre en construisant un indicateur simple de Développement Durable pour 15 pays. En suivant les étapes essentielles, les résultats obtenus par la moyenne arithmétique montrent que dans l'ensemble, les pays à revenus élevés, exception faite des USA, ont un IDD supérieur 0,7. Les pays émergents sont les moins soutenables de l'échantillon, les PED étant dans une position intermédiaire. La méthode géométrique ...
The Composite Indices (CI) are essential for policy-makers. They can be used to guide public policy. The same tools are used to evaluate the performance of public equities. However, they are subject to debate, as there are no standard rules for their construction. This paper discusses the methodological issues in the development of CI. It illustrates them by building a simple sustainable development index for 15 countries. Following the basic steps, the results obtained by the arithmetic mean show that in general, high-income countries, except the USA, have a higher 0.7 index. Emerging countries are the least sustainable of the sample, the developing countries are in an intermediate position. The geometric method provides mixed results. With this method, it is the emerging economies that become leaders in the standings and rich countries, except Australia, saw their index to deteriorate sharply. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the scores and rankings of countries are sensitive to the methods used. It confirms the uniqueness of the BOD method. The uncertainty weighting methodologies ranges from 1.27% to 95.16% in developing countries and emerging countries against 23% on average for the developed countries. ; Les Indices Composites (IC) sont indispensables pour les décideurs publics. Ils peuvent servir à orienter les politiques publiques. Les mêmes outils sont utilisés pour évaluer les performances des actions publiques. Cependant, ils sont sujets à débats tant il n'existe pas de règles standard pour leur construction. Cet article discute des aspects méthodologiques dans l'élaboration des IC. IL les illustre en construisant un indicateur simple de Développement Durable pour 15 pays. En suivant les étapes essentielles, les résultats obtenus par la moyenne arithmétique montrent que dans l'ensemble, les pays à revenus élevés, exception faite des USA, ont un IDD supérieur 0,7. Les pays émergents sont les moins soutenables de l'échantillon, les PED étant dans une position intermédiaire. La méthode géométrique ...
