Duty to Respond: Mass crime, Denial and Collective Responsibility
Front cover -- Title page -- Copyright page -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Chapter One: Criminal Regime, its Subjects, and Collective Crime -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The Challenge of the Disturbing Past -- 3 Regime and its Subjects: Regime Crime andCollective Crime -- 3.1 REGIME CRIMES -- 3.2 COLLECTIVE CRIMES -- 3.2.1 The preparation of collective crime -- 3.2.2 Criminal action -- 3.2.3 Approving outcomes of crime -- Chapter Two: Politics of Silence and Denial -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Transitional Justice or Just the Transition? Politics of Silence -- 2.1 GENERAL ARGUMENT: VULNERABILITY OF DEMOCRACY -- 2.2 SPECIFIC ARGUMENTS -- 2.2.1 Political reconciliation in the name of protecting the genuine common identity -- 2.2.2 Injustice -- 2.2.3 Unmasterable burden -- 3 "We did Nothing Wrong": Politics of Denial -- 4 A Summary -- Chapter Three: Culture, Knowledge, and Collective Crime: Reading Relativism -- 1 Introduction: Crime-specific Culture -- 2 Moral Relativism as a Philosophical Argument -- 3 Blaming Culture for Moral Confusion? -- 3.1 COLLECTIVE CRIME AS A NORMATIVE PRACTICE -- 3.2 INABILITY THESIS -- 3.2.1 Supporting inability thesis: psychology of obedience to authority -- 3.2.2 Supporting inability thesis: on the political production of culture -- 4 The Inability Thesis as the Authenticity Thesis: on "Broken Thermometers," "Genuine Beliefs," and Mass Crimes -- 4.1 RICHARD ARNESON ON MORAL INEQUALITY AND RESPONSIBILITY -- 4.2 MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN AND THE DEBATE ON "EXCUSING THE INEXCUSABLE" -- 5 Gilbert Harman on the Non-moral Character of Extreme Intentions -- Chapter Four: Moral Responsibility for Collective Crime -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Conceptualizing Moral Responsibility -- 2.1 A PRELIMINARY DEFINITION -- 2.2 RESPONSIBILITY AS A RELATIONSHIP -- 3 Social Groups -- 3.1 THE CHALLENGE OF METHODOLOGICAL INDIVIDUALISM.
