Suchergebnisse

IntroductionAround the world, the need for mental health, addictions and home care services is growing. Government commitment and collective efforts to bridge data gaps, develop indicators and publicly report results are key elements in Canada's efforts to improve access.
Objectives and ApproachThis symposium will demonstrate how a coalition of stakeholders united to use real-world data to measure progress and drive change. Each presentation highlights a different aspect of the project with participant interaction, aiming for the Canadian context to spark knowledge exchange across sectors and countries:

Presentation 1 - Coalitions and consensus (10 min.): processes and engagement for successful collaboration between governments, providers, measurement experts and people with lived experiences to select and develop indicators

Facilitated Q&A (5 min.)


Presentation 2 - Standards and data infrastructure (10 min.): new standards to enhance data comparability and strengthened data infrastructure to support measurement and reporting

Facilitated Q&A (5 min.)


Presentation 3 - Indicator development (10 min.): the indicator development cycle, methodological approaches using linked and partial data, and development strategies for new concepts

Facilitated Q&A (5 min.)


Presentation 4 - Public reporting and policy impact (10 min.): describes how public reporting supports sustained commitments and energizes change using targeted tools and messages

Facilitated Q&A (15 min.)



ResultsPublic reporting began in 2019, with 3 new indicators released annually over 4 years. Initial reporting provides a baseline to track improvements, and a starting point for health system planners to learn from peers across Canada. The indicators have been a catalyst to fill important data gaps in emergency and home care services.
Conclusion / ImplicationsThrough shared priorities, coalitions and linked data, information gaps are being filled to drive advancements in access to mental health and addictions services, and home care. Lessons learned in Canada can be adapted internationally to galvanize needed improvements in these sectors.

IntroductionNotwithstanding Canada's exceptional longitudinal health data and research centres with extensive experience transforming data into knowledge, many Canadian studies based on linked administrative data have focused on a single province or territory. Health Data Research Network Canada (HDRN Canada), a new not-for-profit corporation, will bring together major national, provincial and territorial health data stewards from across Canada. HDRN Canada's first initiative is the $81 million SPOR Canadian Data Platform funded under the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR).
Objectives and ApproachHDRN Canada is a distributed network through which individual data-holding centres work together to (i) create a single portal and support system for researchers requesting multi-jurisdictional data, (ii) harmonize and validate case definitions and key analytic variables across jurisdictions, (iii) expand the sources and types of data linkages, (iv) develop technological infrastructure to improve data access and collection, (v) create supports for advanced analytics and (vi) establish strong partnerships with patients, the public and with Indigenous communities. We will share our experiences and gather international feedback on our network and its goals from symposium participants.
ResultsIn January 2020, HDRN Canada launched its Data Access Support Hub (DASH) which includes an inventory listing over 380 datasets, information about more than 120 algorithms and a repository of requirements and processes for accessing data. HDRN Canada is receiving requests for multi-province research studies that would be challenging to conduct without HDRN Canada.
Conclusion / ImplicationsThus far, HDRN Canada services and tools have been developed primarily for Canadian researchers but HDRN Canada can also serve as a prompt for an international discussion about what has/has not worked in terms of multi-jurisdictional research data infrastructure. It can also present an opportunity for the development of metadata, standards and common approaches that support more multi-country research.

IntroductionThe importance of the determinants of health to health outcomes has long been established. Historically, data from each of these sectors has been captured in disparate, often siloed, sources. Attempts to integrate these data have faced a number of challenges including technical, legislative and interpretative barriers, creating inefficiencies and inhibiting knowledge sharing. Despite this, there have been notable successes where intersectoral data and health data have been brought together in a meaningful way. The establishment of strong partnerships, with academia, governments, privacy and legal sectors, and other bodies, across sectors has been key to this success. These partnerships ensure data are integrated, analyzed, and interpreted accurately and appropriately, while also leveraging existing investments and expertise.
Objectives and ApproachThe objective of this session is to explore the role of partnerships throughout the data integration life cycle, from initial discussions, to data integration, through to connecting research output to policy impact. Each of the presenters will discuss the successes, barriers and mitigation strategies they have experienced across different jurisdictions using real world examples.
ResultsHealth research institutes globally are increasingly able to access routinely collected intersectoral data from non-health sectors. In each institute, data are unique, complex and have been collected in a manner consistent with the needs of the sector. As health research institutes work to understand the data structures and determine the best way to link, use and interpret the information according to national and international best practice guidelines, it has become clear that it is critical to undertake this in partnership with experts from each sector, who understand how the data was collected and can guide appropriate interpretation. In addition, these partnerships have enabled the connection of policy priorities in other sectors with research done in the health sector using intersectoral data. For example, in addition to supporting government health departments, health research institutes have collaborated with other government ministries including immigration, social services, and education. This session will present real world examples from local (provincial), national and international contexts, and highlight a novel data platform, being developed to minimize barriers to data access and use across sectors and jurisdictions.
Conclusion / ImplicationsThe participants on this panel will demonstrate the importance of partnership throughout the data integration life cycle when working with intersectoral data using real world examples. Collaboration increases the value of integrated data to both health and non-health sectors, through the connection of policy priorities and support of research across the determinants of health.

Das Heft befaßt sich in seinem Schwerpunktthema mit Fragen der Arbeitsorganisation und erfolgreichen Innovationen. Neben einleitenden Bemerkungen enthält es dazu folgende Beiträge: Die Bedeutung von Innovationen für Human-Resource-Strategien; Beschäftigung und Innovation durch moderne Kommunikationstechnologien; Veränderungen in der Arbeitsorganisation und öffentliche Förderung. Das Beispiel Work Life Fund (Schweden). (IAB)

BackgroundIn December 2017 the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) issued a request for proposals to develop a pan-Canadian health data platform. This platform will enable cross-jurisdictional research by facilitating the use of rich provincial and national data and ensure engagement with patients and specific populations including Indigenous partners. Academics and policy makers from across Canada operating under the banner of the Pan-Canadian Real-World Health Data Network (PRHDN) have joined forces to address this call.
ObjectivesCreate national infrastructure that is built once then made available for research, benchmarking, performance monitoring, multi-jurisdictional evaluations and inter-jurisdictional comparisons to address pressing health and social policy problems in Canada.
MethodsOur approach will address several issues including creating significant efficiencies in data access, streamlining cross provincial/ territorial ethics and access approvals, establishing standards for data and methods harmonization and providing innovative and privacy-conscious solutions to data access and use. The presentation will focus on the plan to create harmonized common data, algorithms and analytic protocols, and link administrative data to electronic medical records and clinical trials to create an integrated and documented infrastructure for pan-Canadian studies. Comparisons to PopMedNet and the Sentinel Initiative in the US will be made.
ConclusionProvincial centres across Canada hold rich sources of health and social data that are linkable at the person-level. With the exception of standardized data managed by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), these data are often not comparable from one province to another, thereby limiting use to single-province studies. There is growing interest in Canada in creating an environment that would enable cross-jurisdictional data sharing and analysis' and in sharing experiences to make effective use of linkable administrative data.

IntroductionResearchers and decision makers from across Canada use linked provincial administrative data for analysis and to address research and policy questions. Currently there are several impediments to working harmoniously across provincial boundaries. A group of academic and policy researchers are working to address these multi-jurisdictional obstacles.
Objectives and ApproachResearchers and data organizations from across Canada are working together as the Pan-Canadian Real-World Health Data Network PRHDN). PRHDN aims to: (1) create harmonized data, algorithms and analytic protocols, and (2) link administrative databases to other types of data, including electronic medical records, clinical trials records, "omics data" and records from pan-Canadian cohort studies. PRHDN's vision is to construct a unified, documented infrastructure to advance pan-Canadian population-based research and analysis. This presentation incorporates material that is part of PRHDN's response to a funding call to create national, collaborative infrastructure.
ResultsScientists and staff at PRHDN organizations will create three main categories of infrastructure: 1) Algorithms: Reusable processes, ideally in the form of documented code, which implement a common approach or definition, e.g. to define cases or to create derived variables; 2) Harmonized Common Data: Based on the Sentinel model, we will establish a standardized subset of harmonized common data that are analysis-ready; 3) Common Analytic Protocols: Complementing work of the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), we will establish processes for distributed analysis with common analytic protocols and meta-analysis of results to provide pan-Canadian estimates. Source data would remain within jurisdictional boundaries and only aggregate results would be pooled across jurisdictions. Details of these approaches will be presented.
Conclusion/ImplicationsThis initiative will improve coordinated access to distributed data from across Canada that is built once then used by many stakeholders for a variety of purposes including: research, benchmarking, performance monitoring to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement, multi-jurisdictional evaluations of novel interventions and inter-jurisdictional comparisons.

Administrative health data is recognized for its value for conducting population-based research that has contributed to numerous improvements in health. In Canada, each province and territory is responsible for administering its own publicly funded health care program, which has resulted in multiple sets of administrative health data. Challenges to using these data within each of these jurisdictions have been identified, which are further amplified when the research involves more than one jurisdiction. The benefits to conducting multi-jurisdictional studies has been recognized by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), which issued a call in 2017 for proposals that address the challenges. The grant led to the creation of Health Data Research Network Canada (HDRN), with a vision is to establish a distributed network that facilitates and accelerates multi-jurisdictional research in Canada. HDRN received funding for seven years that will be used to support the objectives and activities of an initiative called the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Canadian Data Platform (SPOR-CDP). In this paper, we describe the challenges that researchers face while using, or considering using, administrative health data to conduct multi-jurisdictional research and the various ways that the SPOR-CDP will attempt to address them. Our objective is to assist other groups facing similar challenges associated with undertaking multi-jurisdictional research.