The past and future of monopolistic competition modeling
In: Research in economics: Ricerche economiche, Band 71, Heft 4, S. 650-652
ISSN: 1090-9451
95 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Research in economics: Ricerche economiche, Band 71, Heft 4, S. 650-652
ISSN: 1090-9451
In: Research in economics: Ricerche economiche, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 166-179
ISSN: 1090-9451
In: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6954
SSRN
Working paper
In: American economic review, Band 99, Heft 1, S. 5-24
ISSN: 1944-7981
Evaluating Recipes for Development Success Avinash Dixit This article offers a provocative critique of the ability of research on the impact of institutions on growth to offer immediate and practical recommendations for reforming and redesigning institutions in developing countries and transition economies. The article suggests a Bayesian diagnostic procedure to identify the causes of economic failure in an individual country as a first step toward remedying the failure. The main purpose of the most scholarly research, both theoretical and empirical, is to improve our understanding of the phenomena and processes being studied. In the concluding section, I suggest a framework or methodology of research that combines general conceptual and empirical findings from academic research and the experience of practitioners to help narrow or identify the causes of failures in individual countries. Besley and Burgess (2002), using panel data from India, find that an informed and active electorate leads to effective incentives for governments to respond to economic problems and that mass media play an important part. Acemoglu (2003) argues that the lack of third-party enforcement in political contracts makes it harder to make credible commitments, and that this explains the absence of a Coase theorem ensuring efficient outcomes in political bargaining. Finally, the theoretical literature, using a repeated-game framework, shows how a partial improvement of an imperfect formal system, by providing a better outside alternative and thereby lessening the harmful consequences of breaking a relational contract, can worsen the outcomes of the informal system (Baker, Gibbons, and Murphy 1994; Dixit 2004). They find that a country's initial conditions are more important than policy changes in determining its economic performance during the first few years of transition; that is, whether the reforms are rapid or gradual is less important. Pmn Avinash Dixit 151 If we observe a particular effect, say E7, then the Bayesian posterior probability that a particular cause, say C5, is present becomes p P Pm 5 5;7 : i 1 pi Pi;7 If we want to be nearly certain whether a cause, say C5, is present, we need to find an outcome, say E7, which will more typically be a cluster of outcomes or symptoms and might be called a "syndrome," such that It is very unlikely to occur when the underlying cause is any other cause, that is, Pi7 is close to It is very likely to occur when C5 is present, that is, P5,7 is close to one, so the rest of the P5,j's are close to zero, and if some other effect is observed, the posterior probability of C5 becomes close to zero.
BASE
In: Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century, S. 197-211
In: Journal of political economy, Band 111, Heft 6, S. 1293-1317
ISSN: 1537-534X
In: American economic review, Band 93, Heft 5, S. 1824-1829
ISSN: 1944-7981
In: Economics & politics, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 107-133
ISSN: 1468-0343
Transaction‐cost politics views economic policy‐making as a political process constrained by asymmetric information and limited commitment possibilities. This paper examines some implications of this perspective for less‐developed countries (LDCs) considering policy reform. It emphasizes that success requires reform of the rules and institutions which govern the strategic interaction of the participants in the political game, and that reforms must cope with the special interests and asymmetric information which already exist. In this light, it examines some broad issues of the design of constitutions and institutions (definition and enforcement of property rights, control of inflation, and of government expenditures, federalism, and redistribution), as well as some specific issue of the design of organizations and incentives (problems posed by the interaction of multiple tasks and multiple interests, and their interaction with the limitations on auditing and administration that exists in many LDCs).
In: The journal of human resources, Band 37, Heft 4, S. 696
ISSN: 1548-8004
In: The economic journal: the journal of the Royal Economic Society, Band 110, Heft 466, S. 759-780
ISSN: 1468-0297
In: American economic review, Band 89, Heft 3, S. 694-694
ISSN: 1944-7981
In: The economic journal: the journal of the Royal Economic Society, Band 109, Heft 456, S. 443-452
ISSN: 1468-0297
In: Economics & politics, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 225-230
ISSN: 0954-1985
In: Journal of economic dynamics & control, Band 19, Heft 1-2, S. 327-350
ISSN: 0165-1889