Suchergebnisse

Drought frequency and intensity are projected to increase throughout the southeastern USA, the natural range of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.), and are expected to have major ecological and economic implications. We analyzed the carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions in tree ring cellulose of loblolly pine in a factorial drought (similar to 30% throughfall reduction) and fertilization experiment, supplemented with trunk sap flow, allometry and microclimate data. We then simulated leaf temperature and applied a multi-dimensional sensitivity analysis to interpret the changes in the oxygen isotope data. This analysis found that the observed changes in tree ring cellulose could only be accounted for by inferring a change in the isotopic composition of the source water, indicating that the drought treatment increased the uptake of stored moisture from earlier precipitation events. The drought treatment also increased intrinsic water-use efficiency, but had no effect on growth, indicating that photosynthesis remained relatively unaffected despite 19% decrease in canopy conductance. In contrast, fertilization increased growth, but had no effect on the isotopic composition of tree ring cellulose, indicating that the fertilizer gains in biomass were attributable to greater leaf area and not to changes in leaf-level gas exchange. The multi-dimensional sensitivity analysis explored model behavior under different scenarios, highlighting the importance of explicit consideration of leaf temperature in the oxygen isotope discrimination (Delta O-18(c)) simulation and is expected to expand the inference space of the Delta O-18(c) models for plant ecophysiological studies. ; Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation project (PINEMAP); Coordinated Agricultural Project (USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture award) [2011-68002-30185]; National Science Foundation (NSF)National Science Foundation (NSF) [EAR-1344703, IOS-1754893]; French Agence Nationale de la rechercheFrench National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-17-ASIE-0007-02, ANR-18-PRIM-0006-09] ; This research was funded by The Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation project (PINEMAP), a Coordinated Agricultural Project (USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture award 2011-68002-30185), the National Science Foundation (NSF-EAR-1344703 and NSF-IOS-1754893 to J.-C.D.) and the French Agence Nationale de la recherche (ANR-17-ASIE-0007-02 and ANR-18-PRIM-0006-09 to J.-C.D.). ; Public domain authored by a U.S. government employee

Net primary productivity (NPP) and net ecosystem production (NEP) are often used interchangeably, as their difference, heterotrophic respiration (soil heterotrophic CO2 efflux, R-SH = NPP-NEP), is assumed a near-fixed fraction of NPP. Here, we show, using a range-wide replicated experimental study in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations that R-SH responds differently than NPP to fertilization and drought treatments, leading to the divergent responses of NPP and NEP. Across the natural range of the species, the moderate responses of NPP (+11%) and R-SH (-7%) to fertilization combined such that NEP increased nearly threefold in ambient control and 43% under drought treatment. A 13% decline in R-SH under drought led to a 26% increase in NEP while NPP was unaltered. Such drought benefit for carbon sequestration was nearly twofold in control, but disappeared under fertilization. Carbon sequestration efficiency, NEP:NPP, varied twofold among sites, and increased up to threefold under both drought and fertilization. ; USDA National Institute of Food and AgricultureUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [2011-68002-30185]; US Forest Service Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center [08-JV-11330147-038]; McIntire-Stennis Project [121209 94160] ; Published version ; This study was conducted as part of The Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation Project (PINEMAP) that was a Coordinated Agricultural Project funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Award #2011-68002-30185. The authors thank Foley Timber and Land Company (Florida), Ed Hurliman (Oklahoma), and the Virginia Department of Forestry, Appomattox-Buckingham State Forest (Virginia) for providing property access to install the experiments. Partial support was provided by US Forest Service Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center Grant 08-JV-11330147-038, and McIntire-Stennis Project 121209 94160. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. ; Public domain authored by a U.S. government employee