Suchergebnisse

The accused is a person who has the right to describe the accusation، The status of the accused entails that the criminal proceedings shall be taken in the face of the accused person and such proceedings involve an infringement of the freedoms of the accused person by arrest, arrest or search. The longer the time taken for criminal proceedings, the higher the burden on the accused, Reconciliation, whether at the personal level, has been affected by freedom and security, their health at the family and social level, or the professional level. And since criminal procedures aim to reach evidence that would reveal the truth to achieve criminal justice, then it is the state's means to implement its right to punish the perpetrator. However, these criminal procedures should be as necessary to achieve that goal, and these procedures should not take long, because late justice is unfair. On this basis, the accused's right to trial is presented within a reasonable period, and if this right is apparently and primarily determined in the interest of the accused. In reality, however, it fulfills, in addition to the interests of the accused, the interest of society in reaching the truth and achieving justice as quickly as possible without undue delay or delay in a way that harms the accused, society, and criminal justice.

The legality of the evidence is one of the basic components of procedural legitimacy in general, which requires that the law be the source for every rule that allows infringement of rights and freedoms. The criminal procedures are, in essence, and reality, guarantees of the rights and freedoms of the accused, which ensure that his freedom is not violated and the right to defend himself. These procedures were going through two stages, one before the trial and the other taking place during the trial. In each of these two stages, the freedom of the accused is exposed to several risks, arrest, arrest, interrogation, and monitoring of correspondence and communications, so these procedures must be carried out in accordance with the rules specified in the law – the Code of Procedure Criminal – that the constitutional legitimacy of the Code of Criminal Procedure is based mainly on the protection provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure for the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, and without the application of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is not possible to apply the Penal Code, that is the road linking the two stages of criminalization and punishment, and through it, the Penal Code moves from criminalization to punishment, and for this to be achieved, criminal procedures must be carried out as acts Legal aims to protect rights and freedoms within the framework of constitutional legitimacy based on the origin of innocence, and therefore the evidence presented to prove what contradicts the origin of innocence must be legitimate, that is, it should not be the result of procedures tainted by violating personal freedom and rights of defense, and if it is, it is considered illegal evidence and it is not valid Reliance on it to issue a verdict of conviction.