Suchergebnisse

Mehr als 15 Jahre, nachdem eine neue digitale Post-NPM Ära ausgerufen wurde, fehlt es der Digitalisierungsforschung weiterhin an Tiefe. Während interne Prozesse und Verfahren oft unbeachtet blieben, lag der Fokus in der Vergangenheit auf der Untersuchung digitaler Dienstleistungen an der Schnittstelle zwischen Verwaltung und Bürger. Um Forschung in diesem Bereich zu konsolidieren, schlägt dieser Debattenbeitrag vor, klassische Ansätze für die Digitalisierungsforschung "fit" zu machen. Anschließend sollten Effekte der Digitalisierung, insbesondere auf die Effizienz von Organisationen (auch negative Auswirkungen z.B. durch Digital Red Tape), innerhalb der Verwaltung analysiert werden. Dafür muss jedoch beantwortet werden, wie Digitalisierung gemessen und operationalisiert werden kann.

Despite growing interest, we lack a clear understanding of how the arguably ambiguous phenomenon of agile is perceived in government practice. This study aims to alleviate this puzzle by investigating how managers and employees in German public sector organisations make sense of agile as a spreading management fashion in the form of narratives. This is important because narratives function as innovation carriers that ultimately influence the manifestations of the concept in organisations. Based on a multi-case study of 31 interviews and 24 responses to a qualitative online survey conducted in 2021 and 2022, we provide insights into what public sector managers, employees and consultants understand (and, more importantly, do not understand) as agile and how they weave it into their existing reality of bureaucratic organisations. We uncover three meta-narratives of agile government, which we label 'renew', 'complement' and 'integrate'. In particular, the meta-narratives differ in their positioning of how agile interacts with the characteristics of bureaucratic organisations. Importantly, we also show that agile as a management fad serves as a projection surface for what actors want from a modern and digital organisation. Thus, the vocabulary of agile government within the narratives is inherently linked to other diffusing phenomena such as new work or digitalisation.

AbstractPublic encounters are an essential element in citizen–state interactions. Yet, we know very little about the interactional dynamics between clients and street‐level bureaucrats. By analyzing data from interviews and participatory observations of public encounters in a social security administration context, we propose a typology of public encounters based on clients' and employees' preparedness that affects the dynamics and outcomes of services. Encounters can either be characterized by "Conflict and Obstruction," "Advocacy," "Case Processing," or "Agreement and Collaboration." We conceptualize the relation between these types and how both clients and caseworkers transition between them. Additionally, the article's findings suggest that public encounters should not be observed as singular events. Rather, spillover effects between encounters and long‐term multi‐episode interactions with clients prove to be essential in understanding behavior on both sides through mutual learning.

Die Corona-Pandemie hat im Frühjahr 2020 auch die öffentliche Verwaltung gezwungen, die Arbeit zu einem großen Teil ins Homeoffice zu verlagern. Dieser Beitrag stellt die Ergebnisse einer Studie vor, die mittels qualitativer Interviews und einer Online-Befragung (N=1.189) Beschäftigte öffentlicher Organisationen zum Umgang mit der Krise und den Erfahrungen mit dem Homeoffice befragt hat.