DVCC Protocol
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 19-31
ISSN: 1537-940X
21 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 19-31
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 10, Heft 3-4, S. 376-377
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 217-218
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 6, Heft 3-4, S. 163-164
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 1-5
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Family court review: publ. in assoc. with: Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Band 59, Heft 4, S. 828-830
ISSN: 1744-1617
Parental Alienation: Science and Law is a book that brings together known supporters of parental alienation theory to review the definitions, prevalence, consequences and interventions for treating cases where parental alienation has been identified as the dominant cause of parent‐child contact problems. The book provides a review of published literature that favors parental alienation theory and highlights topics and issues that are central to the promotion of parental alienation in the family courts. The book is purposely written with the aim to educate about parental alienation and to debunk the detractors (including sections that specifically refute opposing claims).
In: Family court review: publ. in assoc. with: Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Band 58, Heft 2, S. 470-487
ISSN: 1744-1617
Parent–child contact problems may arise in the context of high conflict separation/divorce dynamics between parents. In cases where there are parent–child contact problems and children resist or refuse contact with one of their parents, there may also be incidents of child maltreatment, intimate partner violence, or compromised parenting that can be experienced by a parent or child as traumatic. The circumstances around separation and/or post‐divorce often result in intense stress for families. In this paper we distinguish between the stressful circumstances that may arise as a result of high interparental conflict and pulls for alignment from a parent, and the real or perceived trauma as a factor which contributes to resistance or refusal of a child to have contact with a parent. Interventions to address both trauma responses and the resist‐refuse dynamics are differentiated and discussed. After screening and assessment, the intent is to treat trauma responses with short‐term, evidence‐based therapy, either before or concurrent with co‐parent and family intervention.
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 10, Heft 3-4, S. 325-358
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 99-119
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 250-309
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 9, Heft 1-2, S. 69-84
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 253-265
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: Journal of child custody: research, issues and practices, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 65-106
ISSN: 1537-940X
In: International journal of the addictions, Band 29, Heft 14, S. 1787-1800
In: Family court review: publ. in assoc. with: Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Band 62, Heft 1, S. 146-159
ISSN: 1744-1617
AbstractFamily violence is a multifaceted issue encompassing various harmful behaviors within familial relationships. This paper explores the definitional problems presented in this special issue on family violence and its impact on parenting and coparenting. By examining the shifts and expansions of concepts related to family violence over time, we highlight the transformative turns in this special issue that have helped us to clarify our understanding of family violence. We explore the transformative expansions of family violence by situating this exploration within a "concept creep" analysis. We make a note of the underlying assumptions associated with these concepts. Through an analysis of concept creep, we elucidate how the expansions and redefinition of violence‐related terms have influenced our understanding of family violence. By differentiating family violence, intimate partner violence, and maltreatment, we emphasize the necessity of unpacking these terms to avoid oversimplification or overlooking certain forms of violence that may go unnoticed under narrow definitions. The authors further highlight the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to address the complexities of family violence and its impact on parenting and coparenting. By acknowledging and responding to expansions of concepts in family violence, we can strive to protect and support children in these challenging circumstances, ultimately promoting their well‐being and creating safer family environments.