Suchergebnisse

AbstractAimAttention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a childhood neurodevelopmental disorder primarily characterized by inattention and hyperactivity that affects approximately 7.2% of children and adolescents worldwide. This study aimed to assess whether children and adolescents with ADHD were more likely to have dental trauma when compared to their healthy peers.MethodsThis study was reported following the statements proposed in MOOSE (Meta‐analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology). PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, APA PsycINFO, LILACS, and grey literature were searched until October 2022. Observational studies with a control group were eligible. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. The meta‐analysis was performed using the R language. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was applied.ResultsA total of 239 studies were detected; of these, six were included in the qualitative synthesis and four were merged in the meta‐analysis (OR = 1.80 [1.16–2.80]; I2 = 18.6% [0.0%–87.5%]). The risk of bias was high. The strength of the evidence was "very low."ConclusionChildren and adolescents with ADHD are more likely to have dental trauma than their non‐ADHD peers. However, due to limitations in the design of the included studies, a causal relationship cannot be established.

AbstractAimsCerebral palsy (CP) is the term for a set of neurological disorders resulting from brain damage that impairs motor function. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether individuals with CP are at a greater risk of negative periodontal health outcomes compared to those without CP.MethodsThis study followed the recommendations of the MOOSE guidelines. Electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, Embase, and PsycInfo databases. Observational studies assessing periodontal outcomes in individuals with CP were included. Risk of bias was appraised using the Newcastle‐Ottawa scale. Meta‐analyses were conducted and the results were presented using standardized mean differences (SMD), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The strength of the evidence was also assessed.ResultsA total of 316 records were retrieved from the electronic databases, 17 of which were included in the qualitative synthesis. Meta‐analyses revealed significantly higher scores in individuals with CP compared to those without CP for the oral hygiene index (SMD = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.17–0.78, I2 = 80%), gingival index (SMD = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.39–1.11], I2 = 79%), plaque index (SMD = 0.70 [95% CI: 0.07–1.33], I2 = 93%), and calculus index (SMD = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.76–1.20], I2 = 0%). However, no significant difference was found between groups for the prevalence of gingivitis (OR = 1.27 [95% CI: 0.28–5.66], I2 = 93%). The risk of bias for the outcome assessment and statistical tests was low. The strength of the evidence was deemed very low.ConclusionIndividuals with CP may experience more significant negative periodontal health outcomes compared to those without CP.