The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
33 results
Sort by:
Niamh Dunne undertakes a systematic exploration of the relationship between competition law and economic regulation as legal mechanisms of market control. Beginning from a theoretical assessment of these legal instruments as discrete mechanisms, the author goes on to address numerous facets of the substantive interrelationship between competition law and economic regulation. She considers, amongst other aspects, the concept of regulatory competition law; deregulation, liberalisation and 'regulation for competition'; the concurrent application of competition law in regulated markets; and relevant institutional aspects including market study procedures, the distribution of enforcement powers between competition agencies and sector regulators, and certain legal powers that demonstrate a 'hybridised' quality lying between competition law and economic regulation. Throughout her assessment, Dunne identifies and explores recurrent considerations that inform and shape the optimal relationship between these legal mechanisms within any jurisdiction
In: Common market law review, Volume 60, Issue 5, p. 1483-1486
ISSN: 1875-8320
In: The Antitrust bulletin: the journal of American and foreign antitrust and trade regulation, Volume 67, Issue 2, p. 341-366
ISSN: 1930-7969
The United Kingdom, like many jurisdictions, is introducing more demanding ex ante regulation for the digital economy. Centered on the work of a Digital Markets Unit located within the existing copetition authority, the U.K. proposals are defined by an explicit commitment to "pro-competition" regulation. This article traces the evolution and emerging design of the forthcoming U.K. regime. It then explores the notion of pro-competition regulation in greater detail. While the concept increasingly transcends its domestic origins, this article argues that the balancing act between conventional competition law and traditional regulation that it reflects can be fully understood only when located within the distinctive circumstances of the wider U.K. regulatory landscape.
In: Common Market Law Review, Volume 58, Issue 4, p. 1229-1248
ISSN: 0165-0750
In: LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 08/2021
SSRN
In: LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 09/2021
SSRN
In: The Antitrust bulletin: the journal of American and foreign antitrust and trade regulation, Volume 65, Issue 3, p. 376-400
ISSN: 1930-7969
The prohibition of cartels embodies arguably the sole universal norm of global competition law. Yet a precise understanding of what constitutes a cartel remains elusive, a problem that is exacerbated in the context of Article 101 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by the Commission's administrative enforcement procedures and the expansive approach to the "by object" category of restraints. This article aims to provide a more precise characterization of the hard core cartel concept as reflected in EU competition case law and practice and to explore why such conduct continues to constitute the "supreme evil" of contemporary antitrust enforcement.
In: The Antitrust bulletin: the journal of American and foreign antitrust and trade regulation, Volume 65, Issue 2, p. 256-281
ISSN: 1930-7969
While European Union (EU) competition law has long been understood as a variety of public interest law, the extent to which the rules can be applied directly to advance noneconomic public interest-oriented goals is more contentious. This contribution considers whether and how such concerns can be accommodated within the framework of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). It considers both the conventional approach to addressing public interest concerns within the analytical structure of the antitrust rules and also how broader public interest objectives have shaped recent EU-level enforcement efforts in three key sectors: the liberalizing public utilities markets, the pharmaceutical sector, and the digital economy.
In: Common Market Law Review, Volume 57, Issue 1, p. 272-274
ISSN: 0165-0750
In: Forthcoming in A. MacCulloch, B. Rodger and P. Whelan (eds), The UK Competition Regime: A Twenty-Year Retrospective, Oxford University Press, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
The prohibition of cartels embodies arguably the sole universal norm of global competition law. Yet a precise understanding of what constitutes a cartel remains elusive, a problem that is exacerbated in the context of Article 101 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by the Commission's administrative enforcement procedures and the expansive approach to the "by object" category of restraints. This article aims to provide a more precise characterization of the hard core cartel concept as reflected in EU competition case law and practice and to explore why such conduct continues to constitute the "supreme evil" of contemporary antitrust enforcement.
BASE
In: Global Centre for Competition Law Annual Conference in January 2019
SSRN
Working paper
In: Yearbook of European law, Volume 37, p. 344-394
ISSN: 2045-0044