Suchergebnisse

<b>Objective:</b> Genetic testing for cancer risk will shortly enter medical practice. Our intent was to increase the understanding of the public's attitudes towards and potential demand for genetic testing. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a random-digit-dial survey of 1,450 adults in Washington State to assess the public's attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer risk and to investigate correlates of intention to be tested for breast cancer risk (women) and prostate cancer risk (men). No specific genes were mentioned, as the intent of the survey was to understand the general interest in screening for genetic risks. The survey addressed familiarity with genetic testing, intention to be tested for breast or prostate cancer risk (when tests become available), benefits and risks associated with genetic tests, and who should have access to test results. <b>Results:</b> Most respondents expressed the intention to be tested for breast or prostate cancer risk (women 76%, men 83%). Most women (83%) and men (74%) would give the results to their primary care physician, but fewer believed that the test results should be available to their employer (women 5%, men 9%), their health insurer (women 32%, men 31%), or family members (women 42%, men 43%). Over 60% worried that discrimination could arise from genetic testing. Correlates of intention to be tested for breast cancer (women) included a family history of breast cancer, lower education, poor health, a history of mammography screening, and more physician visits in the past year. Among men, correlates of intention to test for prostate cancer included higher income, previous cancer diagnosis, a history of PSA screening, and more physician visits in the past year. Respondents who strongly believed in the benefits of genetic testing, who perceived themselves at greater risk for having a gene that increases risk, or who were less worried about discrimination expressed greater intent to be tested. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our survey suggests that the demand for genetic tests for cancer risk may be high, although confidentiality of test results is a major concern. Health care providers, genetic counselors, and research institutions should prepare strategies and policies for genetic testing and counseling as these tests enter general medical practice.

<i>Objective:</i> To conduct the first employer/workplace survey identifying employment opportunities for graduates of programs with training in public health genetics in the USA, and to determine whether employment opportunities will increase in coming years. <i>Methods:</i> Six public health genetics training competencies were developed. A survey about workplace and employment opportunities was then conducted with mailings to (1) departments in schools of public health and departments of preventive medicine, (2) local and regional public health officials, (3) insurance companies and health management organizations (HMOs), and (4) biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. <i>Results:</i> A total of 196 surveys were returned among 1,464 that were mailed. Response rates varied from 5.8 to 46.5% among the target groups. The percent of responding organizations currently employing individuals with skills in genetics ranged from 20 to 62%. The percent currently employing individuals with skills in public health ranged from 39 to 96%. Training opportunities such as internships or practicum experiences are reported for one-third of respondents. For all of the competencies, approximately half of survey respondents who rated the competency important or very important already employ individuals with public health genetics skills. Similarly, at least a quarter of survey respondents who rated the competency important or very important plan to hire individuals with that skill in the next 5 years. Overall, approximately 40% of those surveyed are planning to hire individuals with competencies in public health genetics in the next 5 years. <i>Conclusion:</i> Employment opportunities already exist and new positions are becoming available in schools of public health and departments of preventive medicine, departments of public health, insurance companies and HMOs for professionals with public health genetics training. Based on our survey findings, skills and training in public health genetics are important in the workplace.