Search results

PURPOSE: Many US military veterans experience anxiety, depression, and trauma-related disorders. A major goal of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has been to increase access to evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) such as cognitive-behavioral therapy to address veterans' substantial health burden. However, despite widespread implementation of EBPs throughout the VHA, smaller clinics that often serve rural veterans face barriers to delivering these interventions. The Veterans Affairs Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (VA CALM) program aims to empower providers in rural areas with varying levels of training and experience in delivering EBPs to provide high-quality cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety, depression, and trauma-related disorders. The goal of this study was to better understand, through qualitative interviews, VHA community-based outpatient clinic providers' perspectives on implementing VA CALM. METHODS: Qualitative interviews with providers (N = 22) were conducted to understand implementation of VA CALM. Template analysis was used to organize and summarize responses. FINDINGS: Providers noted several facilitators for implementing VA CALM in rural community clinics, including its perceived effectiveness, broad applicability, and structure. Barriers to implementation included scheduling problems and patient-related barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating providers' perspectives on factors that affect implementing cognitive-behavioral therapy in this setting may inform future efforts to disseminate-implement EBPs in smaller, more remote VHA clinics.

Abstract
Many deployed veterans experience issues reintegrating into civilian life. Addressing this in a clinical setting can prove challenging; however, assessing participation, defined as involvement in a life situation by the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, may be helpful. The Community Reintegration of Injured Service Members–Computer Adaptive Test (CRIS-CAT) is a measure of participation developed and validated in veteran populations. The War Related and Illness and Injury Study Center, which provides comprehensive evaluations to veterans with medically unexplained deployment-related concerns, used the CRIS-CAT as part of their social work evaluations during these visits and follow-up telephone calls. This retrospective review of clinical data examines the link between participation as assessed by the CRIS-CAT and factors that are mutable (such as relationships with others) and immutable (personal characteristics) as assessed in the social work evaluation over 12 months. The findings indicate that these veteran patients did not experience change in their participation as measured by the CRIS-CAT. Multivariable regression models demonstrated relationships only between change in CRIS-CAT scales and baseline scores and race. Article concludes by discussing lessons learned from this evaluation of the utility of the CRIS-CAT in clinical care and in longitudinal evaluation.