Covering a broad range of approaches within critical theory including Marxism and post-Marxism, the Frankfurt School, hermeneutics, phenomenology, postcolonialism, feminism, queer theory, poststructuralism, pragmatism, scientific realism, deconstruction and psychoanalysis, this book provides students with a comprehensive and accessible introduction to 32 key critical theorists whose work has been influential in the field of international relations
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
AbstractIn the aftermath of the 7th July 2005 bombings in London, communication with those searching desperately for relatives and friends was one-way or non-existent. The authorities dealing with the processes of the identification of the bodies of those killed or the treatment of those injured adopted procedures and protocols derived from emergency or disaster planning that were framed in terms of an instrumentalisation or objectification of persons. This article traces how these procedures reflect biopolitical forms of global governance that involve the production of life as 'bare life' and details how inappropriate and brutal these forms of governance seemed both to those searching for the missing and to the London Assembly 7th July Review Committee. It concludes that attention needs to be paid to the proliferation of such forms of politics as administration and the objectification they entail before we reach a stage where all life becomes nothing more than bare life, life with no political voice as such.
In the aftermath of the 7th July 2005 bombings in London, communication with those searching desperately for relatives and friends was one-way or non-existent. The authorities dealing with the processes of the identification of the bodies of those killed or the treatment of those injured adopted procedures and protocols derived from emergency or disaster planning that were framed in terms of an instrumentalisation or objectification of persons. This article traces how these procedures reflect biopolitical forms of global governance that involve the production of life as 'bare life' and details how inappropriate and brutal these forms of governance seemed both to those searching for the missing and to the London Assembly 7th July Review Committee. It concludes that attention needs to be paid to the proliferation of such forms of politics as administration and the objectification they entail before we reach a stage where all life becomes nothing more than bare life, life with no political voice as such. Adapted from the source document.
In the current situation of the so-called 'war on terror' the question of political activism in the face of an oppressive hegemony becomes acutely important. The role of academics and intellectuals in this context is the particular focus of this forum. Questions of agency, subjectivity and activism more broadly are raised, but the specific location of the international relations scholar needs to be considered too. Are scholars inevitably already politically located, as everyone is, or is there a sense in which they have a particular responsibility to discharge? How might one begin to imagine a different, perhaps oppositional, form of engagement, and what can this lead to in practice? Contributions engage with questions of normative consciousness, the specificity of cosmopolitanism and its disregard of the postcolonial experience, and forms of activism and contestation that exist already, as well as considering in more theoretical terms what possibilities for a different and more thoroughly ethico-political mode of engagement there might be.
Teaching with Global politics, a new introduction -- Introduction / Jenny Edkins, Maja Zehfuss -- How do we begin to think about the world? / Véronique Pin-Fat -- What happens if we don't think in human terms? / Simon Dalby -- Who do we think we are? / Annick T.R. Wibben -- How do religious beliefs affect politics? / Peter Mandaville -- Why do we obey? / Jenny Edkins -- How do we find out what's going on in the world? / Debbie Lisle -- Why is people's movement restricted? / Roxanne Lynn Doty -- Why is the world divided territorially? / Stuart Elden -- How does the nation-state work? / Michael J. Shapiro -- Do colonialism and slavery belong to the past? / Kate Manzo -- How is the world organized economically? / V. Spike Peterson -- Why are some people better off than others? / Paul Cammack -- How can we end poverty? / Mustapha Kamal Pasha -- Why do some people think they know what is good for others? / Naeem Inayatullah -- Why does politics turn to violence? / Joanna Bourke -- What makes the world dangerous? / Michael Dillon -- What can we do to stop people harming others? / Anne Orford -- Can we move beyond conflict? / Roland Bleiker -- Conclusion : What can we do to change the world? / Maja Zehfuss
Ironically, since 11 September 2001, world politics seems to have taken a turn towards certainty. This article is an intervention that demonstrates how the illusion of the sovereign state in an insecure and anarchic international system is sustained and how it might be challenged. It does so through a Derridean analysis of Hedley Bull's The Anarchical Society. The article examines how International Relations (IR) thinking works; it teases out the implications of our reading of Bull's work and proposes that what we call generalising the international could lead to an alternative analysis of world politics, one that retains an openness to the future and to politics.
In: Edkins , J & Zehfuss , M 2005 , ' Generalising the international ' Review of International Studies , vol 31 , no. 3 , pp. 451-472 . DOI:10.1017/S0260210505006583