Suchergebnisse

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of Administration of Justice as a research field and set out an agenda for future studies that could promote the production of scientific knowledge in this area. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the idiosyncratic features, dimensions of analysis upon the Administration of Justice, states a research agenda and discusses the main challenges on this theme. This paper conceptualizes Administration of Justice as a research field and discusses related phenomena from institutional and economic perspectives on innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy. Findings As a research field, Administration of Justice is defined as a set of theoretical concepts, research methods and techniques, aiming to investigate the management processes associated with the use and articulation of resources, knowledge and institutions, at different levels of the justice system, and their influence on the provision of justice in a given social context. As social phenomena, four levels of analysis are proper to investigate the justice system: societal, inter-organizational, organizational and operational. Innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy are central themes of the Administration of Justice and present various gaps and research opportunities. Research limitations/implications The main implications is the proposal of an agenda for future studies on the Administration of Justice field, which is an important step in raising awareness of the issue. Originality/value Administration of Justice encompasses a growing interest among academics, justice practitioners and public managers regarding managerial and political practices carried out in the justice system. Although relevant, this subject has been scarcely studied by the management community. This paper invites community to adopt an organizational and institutional perspective to Administration of Justice, setting an agenda for future research.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of Administration of Justice as a research field and set out an agenda for future studies that could promote the production of scientific knowledge in this area. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the idiosyncratic features, dimensions of analysis upon the Administration of Justice, states a research agenda and discusses the main challenges on this theme. This paper conceptualizes Administration of Justice as a research field and discusses related phenomena from institutional and economic perspectives on innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy. Findings As a research field, Administration of Justice is defined as a set of theoretical concepts, research methods and techniques, aiming to investigate the management processes associated with the use and articulation of resources, knowledge and institutions, at different levels of the justice system, and their influence on the provision of justice in a given social context. As social phenomena, four levels of analysis are proper to investigate the justice system: societal, inter-organizational, organizational and operational. Innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy are central themes of the Administration of Justice and present various gaps and research opportunities. Research limitations/implications The main implications is the proposal of an agenda for future studies on the Administration of Justice field, which is an important step in raising awareness of the issue. Originality/value Administration of Justice encompasses a growing interest among academics, justice practitioners and public managers regarding managerial and political practices carried out in the justice system. Although relevant, this subject has been scarcely studied by the management community. This paper invites community to adopt an organizational and institutional perspective to Administration of Justice, setting an agenda for future research. ; https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2018-010

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of Administration of Justice as a research field and set out an agenda for future studies that could promote the production of scientific knowledge in this area. Design/methodology/approach – This paper explores the idiosyncratic features, dimensions of analysis upon the Administration of Justice, states a research agenda and discusses the main challenges on this theme. This paper conceptualizes Administration of Justice as a research field and discusses related phenomena from institutional and economic perspectives on innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy. Findings – As a research field, Administration of Justice is defined as a set of theoretical concepts, research methods and techniques, aiming to investigate the management processes associated with the use and articulation of resources, knowledge and institutions, at different levels of the justice system, and their influence on the provision of justice in a given social context. As social phenomena, four levels of analysis are proper to investigate the justice system: societal, inter-organizational, organizational and operational. Innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy are central themes of the Administration of Justice and present various gaps and research opportunities. Research limitations/implications – The main implications is the proposal of an agenda for future studies on the Administration of Justice field, which is an important step in raising awareness of the issue. Originality/value – Administration of Justice encompasses a growing interest among academics, justice practitioners and public managers regarding managerial and political practices carried out in the justice system. Although relevant, this subject has been scarcely studied by the management community. This paper invites community to adopt an organizational and institutional perspective to Administration of Justice, setting an agenda for future research.

O propósito do presente artigo é discutir o fenômeno das alianças estratégicas à luz da perspectiva sociológica de análise em contraponto com a orientação econômica que privilegia a concepção de ator racional, sob uma lógica utilitarista e contratualista. O trabalho foi construído a partir do estudo do caso da constituição de uma aliança estratégica no setor de hotelaria brasileiro. Entrevistas e dados documentais foram analisados qualitativamente, combinando análise de conteúdo tradicional e história oral. Os resultados apontaram aspectos emergentes de ordem sociológica no estudo de alianças estratégicas, os quais serviram de base para a constituição de quatro proposições analíticas: 1. o processo de constituição de alianças estratégicas é influenciado pela atividade interessada de diferentes atores distribuídos numa arena política, cujas ações são orientadas não apenas por expectativas utilitárias, mas também simbólicas; 2. o esforço de atores incumbentes para justificar e legitimar um projeto de cooperação interorganizacional e para mobilizar outros atores em favor de ideias e interesses que se coadunam a esse projeto influencia o processo de formação de alianças estratégicas; 3. princípios, categorias e entendimentos compartilhados acerca da cooperação interorganizacional, construídos na interação dos atores constituintes com agentes externos, condicionam os arranjos formais e relacionais no processo de formação de alianças estratégicas; 4. a constituição de alianças estratégicas depende do quanto os atores organizacionais interpretam sua adesão como desejável ou obrigatória em um determinado contexto social. Conclui-se em favor da complementaridade entre a perspectiva econômica e o olhar sociológico na análise das alianças estratégicas, reconhecendo a inserção social dos atores econômicos, bem como outras dimensões institucionais do ambiente, o que possibilita um entendimento mais aprofundado sobre alianças estratégicas.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of Administration of Justice as a research field and set out an agenda for future studies that could promote the production of scientific knowledge in this area. Design/methodology/approach – This paper explores the idiosyncratic features, dimensions of analysis upon the Administration of Justice, states a research agenda and discusses the main challenges on this theme. This paper conceptualizes Administration of Justice as a research field and discusses related phenomena from institutional and economic perspectives on innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy. Findings – As a research field, Administration of Justice is defined as a set of theoretical concepts, research methods and techniques, aiming to investigate the management processes associated with the use and articulation of resources, knowledge and institutions, at different levels of the justice system, and their influence on the provision of justice in a given social context. As social phenomena, four levels of analysis are proper to investigate the justice system: societal, inter-organizational, organizational and operational. Innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy are central themes of the Administration of Justice and present various gaps and research opportunities. Research limitations/implications – The main implications is the proposal of an agenda for future studies on the Administration of Justice field, which is an important step in raising awareness of the issue. Originality/value – Administration of Justice encompasses a growing interest among academics, justice practitioners and public managers regarding managerial and political practices carried out in the justice system. Although relevant, this subject has been scarcely studied by the management community. This paper invites community to adopt an organizational and institutional perspective to Administration of Justice, setting an agenda for future research.

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of Administration of Justice as a research field and set out an agenda for future studies that could promote the production of scientific knowledge in this area.


Design/methodology/approach
This paper explores the idiosyncratic features, dimensions of analysis upon the Administration of Justice, states a research agenda and discusses the main challenges on this theme. This paper conceptualizes Administration of Justice as a research field and discusses related phenomena from institutional and economic perspectives on innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy.


Findings
As a research field, Administration of Justice is defined as a set of theoretical concepts, research methods and techniques, aiming to investigate the management processes associated with the use and articulation of resources, knowledge and institutions, at different levels of the justice system, and their influence on the provision of justice in a given social context. As social phenomena, four levels of analysis are proper to investigate the justice system: societal, inter-organizational, organizational and operational. Innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy are central themes of the Administration of Justice and present various gaps and research opportunities.


Research limitations/implications
The main implications is the proposal of an agenda for future studies on the Administration of Justice field, which is an important step in raising awareness of the issue.


Originality/value
Administration of Justice encompasses a growing interest among academics, justice practitioners and public managers regarding managerial and political practices carried out in the justice system. Although relevant, this subject has been scarcely studied by the management community. This paper invites community to adopt an organizational and institutional perspective to Administration of Justice, setting an agenda for future research.

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of Administration of Justice as a research field and set out an agenda for future studies that could promote the production of scientific knowledge in this area. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the idiosyncratic features, dimensions of analysis upon the Administration of Justice, states a research agenda and discusses the main challenges on this theme. This paper conceptualizes Administration of Justice as a research field and discusses related phenomena from institutional and economic perspectives on innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy. Findings As a research field, Administration of Justice is defined as a set of theoretical concepts, research methods and techniques, aiming to investigate the management processes associated with the use and articulation of resources, knowledge and institutions, at different levels of the justice system, and their influence on the provision of justice in a given social context. As social phenomena, four levels of analysis are proper to investigate the justice system: societal, inter-organizational, organizational and operational. Innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy are central themes of the Administration of Justice and present various gaps and research opportunities. Research limitations/implications The main implications is the proposal of an agenda for future studies on the Administration of Justice field, which is an important step in raising awareness of the issue. Originality/value Administration of Justice encompasses a growing interest among academics, justice practitioners and public managers regarding managerial and political practices carried out in the justice system. Although relevant, this subject has been scarcely studied by the management community. This paper invites community to adopt an organizational and institutional perspective to Administration of Justice, setting an agenda for future research.

<p>O presente artigo analisou em que medida a utilização do pregão eletrônico pode ser caracterizada como expressão de mito racional associado ao setor público brasileiro. Teoricamente, o trabalho se fundamentou no institucionalismo organizacional e na sociologia do direito. A primeira etapa da pesquisa analisou qualitativamente o contexto normativo referente ao pregão eletrônico e a segunda etapa investigou quantitativamente a celeridade de 184 processos licitatórios realizados pelo Banco do Brasil no primeiro semestre de 2013. Os dados foram interpretados visando analisar a ressonância entre o discurso do TCU e a atividade administrativa do BB. De modo geral, os resultados indicaram que a utilização do pregão não apresentou padrão de comportamento que vincule a celeridade às variáveis de complexidade ou economicidade e constatou-se que o discurso do TCU está construído no sentido de abarcar a utilização do pregão enquanto prática desejável, mesmo onde a obrigatoriedade não se sustenta no texto legal. Tal desejabilidade escapa a questões econômicas e jurídicas, se aproximando de juízos em torno da relevância social. Em resumo: (1) O uso do pregão na Administração Pública e, em específico no Banco do Brasil, decorre da influência simbólica exercida pelo ambiente normativo onde essa prática licitatória é considerada um mito racional; (2) O pregão eletrônico é cerimonialmente adotado, mediante o desacoplamento de pressões institucionais e técnicas; e, (3)<strong> </strong>A legalidade que rege o uso do pregão eletrônico decorre da mútua influência entre práticas organizacionais, ainda que cerimoniais, e da construção de jurisprudência motivada por essas práticas.</p>

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of Administration of Justice as a research field and set out an agenda for future studies that could promote the production of scientific knowledge in this area. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the idiosyncratic features, dimensions of analysis upon the Administration of Justice, states a research agenda and discusses the main challenges on this theme. This paper conceptualizes Administration of Justice as a research field and discusses related phenomena from institutional and economic perspectives on innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy. Findings As a research field, Administration of Justice is defined as a set of theoretical concepts, research methods and techniques, aiming to investigate the management processes associated with the use and articulation of resources, knowledge and institutions, at different levels of the justice system, and their influence on the provision of justice in a given social context. As social phenomena, four levels of analysis are proper to investigate the justice system: societal, inter-organizational, organizational and operational. Innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy are central themes of the Administration of Justice and present various gaps and research opportunities. Research limitations/implications The main implications is the proposal of an agenda for future studies on the Administration of Justice field, which is an important step in raising awareness of the issue. Originality/value Administration of Justice encompasses a growing interest among academics, justice practitioners and public managers regarding managerial and political practices carried out in the justice system. Although relevant, this subject has been scarcely studied by the management community. This paper invites community to adopt an organizational and institutional perspective to Administration of Justice, setting an agenda for future research.

ABSTRACT The interdependence between governance and legitimacy of the courts is a subject that has not been much studied by scholars, especially those from the fields of public administration and organizational studies. Taking into account the importance of these topics for the functioning of these organizations, the purpose of this essay is twofold: to enrich the debate on the contribution of good governance to the legitimacy of courts, and to encourage researchers to address these themes in greater depth. To this end, the main literature on governance and legitimacy of courts is analyzed. Theoretical approaches contribute to the discussion of the functioning of courts, which are highly institutionalized organizations that depend heavily on a presumption of legitimacy. Ensuring this legitimacy has been one of the challenges for these organizations, which are required to adopt governance models that contribute to better management and performance. We argue that there are managerial and substantive implications for society, since the governance and legitimacy of courts can affect the system of justice. We put forward some propositions on the influence of judicial governance on the legitimacy of the justice system and on the perception of legitimacy of the courts. These propositions provide insights for a research agenda on these issues.

Este artigo propõe novos parâmetros e indicadores para avaliar os níveis de independência formal e de facto dos órgãos reguladores. O alvo são as agências dos setores de eletricidade, telecomunicações e petróleo no Brasil. O estudo é orientado por duas perspectivas teóricas: a da necessidade de independência dos órgãos reguladores, uma vez que a interferência política pode elevar os riscos e inibir o investimento privado, especialmente nos setores de infraestrutura; e a da influência das instituições, presentes em cada setor e em cada país, sobre os novos desenhos institucionais. Trata-se de uma pesquisa descritiva, que identificou diferenças nos desenhos institucionais, não captadas por metodologias convencionais, como o índice de governança regulatória, proposto pelo Banco Mundial. Os resultados confirmam a maior resistência às mudanças nos setores de energia: menor independência formal das agências reguladoras e presença mais ativa das autoridades políticas no campo normativo desses setores. Além disso, os índices estimados confirmam que as três agências não dispõem de autonomia para gerir as próprias receitas. Essa limitação à independência de facto ocorre principalmente na fase de elaboração da proposta orçamentária.