Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Contents -- Preface -- 1 Raising Questions -- 2 How the Electoral College Works -- 3 The Electoral College and Political Equality -- 4 Contingent Elections -- 5 The Origins of the Electoral College -- 6 Protecting Interests -- 7 Maintaining Cohesion -- 8 Preserving the Party System -- 9 Conclusion -- Appendix: U.S. Constitutional Provisions Relating to Presidential Elections -- Notes -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- Z.

AbstractDonald Trump came to the presidency claiming a unique proficiency in negotiating deals. Once in office, however, he floundered. He adopted a passive approach to agenda setting, putting him in a reactive mode. Although he received high levels of support from Republicans in both chambers of Congress and although their leaders kept votes that he might lose off the agenda, Congress passed little significant legislation at his behest. The president received historically low levels of support from Democratic senators and representatives and could not win congressional assent for new healthcare policy, immigration reform, or infrastructure spending. Government shutdowns and symbolic slaps at his foreign policies characterized his tenure, even with his party in control of the legislature. He was even less successful after Democrats gained control of the House in the 2018 midterm elections.

AbstractBoth the tone and substance of Donald Trump's public rhetoric are far beyond the norms of the presidency. In this article, I discuss prominent characteristics of the president's public discourse—including branding and delegitimizing opponents, fueling fear, prevaricating, and stoking divisions—and their consequences for both the president's attempts at leadership and the polity as a whole. I find that Trump's public discourse has diminished his ability to govern and has also been deleterious for American democracy.

Donald Trump entered office with aspirations for transformational policy change, much of which would have to be approved by Congress. Despite the president's many unique characteristics, we can employ the framework of the president's strategic position to explain his lack of success. The president's opportunity structure was mixed. He lacked an electoral mandate but was fortunate enough to serve in a unified government. Nevertheless, Republican cohesion was imperfect, partisan polarization was high, and there was little public pressure for Democrats to abate their strong opposition. The structure of most of the choices before Congress did not favor the president. As a result, he has not been successful in obtaining congressional support for most of his major initiatives. Making strategic assessments by asking a few key questions about the president's political environment provides us with crucial leverage for evaluating a president's likely success in obtaining the support of Congress for his initiatives.

Abstract
Donald Trump entered office with aspirations for transformational policy change, much of which would have to be approved by Congress. So far, he and his supporters have been disappointed. Despite the president's many unique characteristics, we can employ the framework of the president's strategic position to explain the president's lack of success. The president's opportunity structure was mixed. Lacking a mandate but fortunate to serve in a unified government, Trump overestimated his public support, which was low, and Republican cohesion, which was imperfect. He also underestimated the impact of partisan polarization and Democratic opposition, which was strong. Moreover, the president lacked a strategic plan of his own, had few substantive proposals, and demonstrated little skill in garnering support.