Otthonosság és idegenség: identitáspolitika és nemzetfelfogás Magyarországon a rendszerváltás óta
In: 20 év után
24 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: 20 év után
In: Múltunk könyvek
In: Politikatörténeti Füzetek 25
In: East central Europe: L' Europe du centre-est : eine wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift, Band 50, Heft 2-3, S. 413-415
ISSN: 1876-3308
In: Journal of Austrian-American history, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 27-36
ISSN: 2475-0913
Abstract
The article dissects the reception of István Deák's The Lawful Revolution within Hungarian historiography. It argues that strangely the book was a precursor of a deeper revision of the history of 1848, and still it is not a major reference. Deák's ambiguous position as a US-Hungarian historian made possible to read his work less with an eye of the broader historical revisionism it promoted, a nonnationalist reading of Habsburg history, and to use it instead to make various arguments within the field of the politics of memory.
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 80, Heft 1, S. 148-150
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Revue d'Allemagne et des pays de langue allemande, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 341-363
ISSN: 2605-7913
In: Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 123-142
The Treaty of Trianon (hereinafter Trianon), the enormous losses of territory and co-ethnics, and the shaking of Hungary's status as a dominant power in the Carpathian Basin imputed a tragic understanding of contemporary Hungarian history on the Hungarian society, invoking the idea of a trauma lasting even today. Trianon's understanding became a divisive issue for political parties after 1989, highlighting the ever-deeper divisions between right and left-liberals, since 2010. Its "overcoming" is a flagship project of the government's politics of identity, with modest success so far. Thus, the 100th anniversary was a crucial moment as a test case for a self-professed nationalist, traditionalist, conservative political force for manifesting a comprehensive politics of memory. In the light of the newly built monument at the heart of Budapest, with the Hungarian names of all localities on the territory of pre-1918 Hungary inscribed on its wall, a cautious shifting back to territorial revisionism was expected. In this article, I will argue that even with such tendencies being, obviously, present, the official commemorations were crafted with a surprising message, that attempts to turn the canonical understanding of Trianon upside down and reframe it into a common catastrophe of Central Europe. Doing so places the consequences in the context of the decolonization of history, the present decline of empires, and the emergence of nation-states while combining it with important tropes of the traditional, anti-liberal and revisionist Trianon discourse. Nevertheless, the result is a transparently political message that is not only driven by easily visible actual political goals (V4 and Central European), but one that detaches the politics of memory from historical references and legacies and creates a set of shallow symbols for utter instrumentalization, to recombine at will, in a vulgarised sense of post-modernism.
In: Südost-Forschungen: internationale Zeitschrift für Geschichte, Kultur und Landeskunde Südosteuropas, Band 79, Heft 1, S. 1-3
ISSN: 2364-9321
In: Südost-Forschungen: internationale Zeitschrift für Geschichte, Kultur und Landeskunde Südosteuropas, Band 79, Heft 1, S. 4-31
ISSN: 2364-9321
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 79, Heft 2, S. 445-447
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Journal of Romanian Studies, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 113-133
ISSN: 2754-415X
In: Regio: kisebbség, politika, társadalom. [Ungarische Ausgabe], Band 26, Heft 2, S. 165
ISSN: 2415-959X
In: Regio: kisebbség, politika, társadalom. [Ungarische Ausgabe], Band 26, Heft 2, S. 128
ISSN: 2415-959X
In: Regio: kisebbség, politika, társadalom. [Ungarische Ausgabe], Band 26, Heft 2, S. 60
ISSN: 2415-959X