Political patronage and economic opportunity: vertical integration in Egyptian textiles and clothing
In: The European journal of development research, Band 35, Heft 5, S. 1224-1257
ISSN: 1743-9728
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The European journal of development research, Band 35, Heft 5, S. 1224-1257
ISSN: 1743-9728
World Affairs Online
In: Review of Middle East economics and finance, Band 16, Heft 1
ISSN: 1475-3693
Abstract
The structural transformation of countries moves them towards more sophisticated, higher-value products. Network analysis, using the Product Space Methodology (PSM), guides countries towards leading export sectors. The identification process rests on two pillars: (1) available opportunities, that is, products in the product space that the country does not yet export which are more sophisticated than its current exports; and (2) the stock of a country's accumulated productive knowledge and the technical capabilities that, through spillovers, enable it to produce slightly more sophisticated products. The PSM points to a tradeoff between capabilities and complexity. It identifies very basic future products that match the two countries' equally basic capabilities. Top products are simple animal products, cream and yogurt, modestly sophisticated plastics, metals and minerals such as salt and sulphur for Egypt; and slightly more sophisticated products such as containers and bobbins (plastics) and broom handles and wooden products for Tunisia, which is the more advanced of the two countries. A more interventionist approach steers the economy towards maximum sophistication, thus identifying highly complex manufactured metals, machinery, equipment, electronics and chemicals. Despite pushing for economic growth and diversification, these sectors push urban job creation and require high-skill workers, with the implication that low-skilled labour may be pushed into unemployment or into low-value informal jobs. A middle ground is a forward-looking strategy that takes sectors' shares in world trade into account.
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 127, S. 1-22
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of development effectiveness, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1943-9407
In: The journal of development studies, Band 59, Heft 8, S. 1213-1235
ISSN: 1743-9140
In: Journal of international trade & economic development: an international and comparative review, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 165-198
ISSN: 1469-9559
In: ESID Working Paper No 143. Manchester: Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre, The University of Manchester
SSRN
Working paper
This study analyses how strengths and weaknesses of economic, societal, political and environmental structures played out during the Covid-19 crisis in Africa since March 2020. Its main aim is to improve evidence on the direct and indirect effects of the pandemic on African countries and, based on that evidence, identify policy implications and formulate recommendations. It comprises the analysis of (a) direct impacts of the pandemic as well as of policy responses such as lockdowns and their potential determinants; (b) indirect effects of lockdowns and policy responses to the pandemic on economic, social, political and environmental domains in the light of structural strengths and weaknesses of African countries. In general, the study is based on the assumption that economic and other structures determine the magnitude and direction of the pandemic's impact on the short and long run. Its added value is the thematic comprehensiveness and the comparative analysis of country clusters. Amongst many other findings, the analysis shows the important role of social cohesion for coping with the pandemic and for sustainable development on the longer run. This implies the need for (a) material and immaterial investments in good and trustful relationships within societies and between society and the state; (b) incentives for increasing cooperation of individuals for a common good need to be at the core of future development strategies. It identifies a trias of political priorities, which are all equally important and relate to each other. They contain (a) inclusive and green economic development that must be linked to (b) the establishment and improvement of universal social systems (health, education, social protection in case of poverty, old age and unemployment) as well as (c) a redesign of political institutions that are capable and inclusive to collect revenues and provide public goods. (d) None of these policy priorities will be effective on the long run without saving ecosystems.
BASE
In: Discussion paper / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, 2021,11
World Affairs Online