Suchergebnisse

The article attempts a philosophical analysis of the digitalization of religious space in the conditions of the «new reality». The emphasis is placed on the fact that the conditions provoked by the pandemic crisis contributed to the rapprochement of human religious life and virtual space. It is argued that a new reflection, forming a new picture of human existence within the boundaries of religious culture, arose as a result of a partial or complete loss of a person's traditional habitual level of communication. The article also gives the author's definition of religious space as a space of religious culture, within the boundaries of which the interaction of a person's religious being (religious life) and digital communication (virtual space) is seen. In the conditions of modern society, the problems and processes occurring within the boundaries of religious space are revealed through the prism of digitalization, transforming the field of communicative relations, which acquire a new meaning. The conclusion is presented that in religious culture there is a new style of communication at the level of digital communication, embedded in the religious being (religious life) of a person, where a person in his traditional appeal to God begins to see the possibility of a different form of interaction, i.e. through online resources. In this regard, it is noted that a new type of communication is being formed within the boundaries of the religious space, introduced by digital technologies.

The article attempts to analyze the problem of spirituality in the works of Chinese authors. The authors emphasize that in the studies of Chinese philosophers, ethnographers, historians, the problem of spirituality is presented in two aspects. Chinese authors explain spirituality as a spiritual culture that determines the degree of human spiritual activity in the study of Chinese culture. This explains the following fact. Chinese philosophers view Taoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism as the spiritual activities of the great sages. We see a different attitude towards the concept of spirituality when they interpret Russian Orthodoxy in China and its role in the formation of Russian culture. In the first case, we are talking about the role of the Orthodox Church in China directly. Therefore, Chinese authors focus on Orthodoxy as a liturgical activity in the context of their research. When they analyze the role of the Orthodox faith in Russian culture, they write about it as a factor that shapes the Russian character and mentality. An analysis of the works of Chinese authors led to the following conclusion. The interpretation of spirituality in the works of Chinese authors is presented as a spiritual social activity. The article presents the works of Chinese philosophers who have not been addressed in Russian studies.