Courts as Catalysts: State Supreme Courts and School Finance Equity. Mathew H. BosworthJudicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Laura Langer
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 64, Issue 4, p. 1271-1273
ISSN: 1468-2508
44 results
Sort by:
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 64, Issue 4, p. 1271-1273
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 64, Issue 4, p. 1271-1273
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 64, Issue 4, p. 1271-1273
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 63, Issue 1, p. 303-305
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 63, Issue 1, p. 303-305
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Social science quarterly, Volume 77, Issue 2, p. 461-462
ISSN: 0038-4941
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 54, Issue 2, p. 543-552
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 54, Issue 2, p. 543
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Volume 64, Issue 4, p. 1271-1273
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Volume 30, Issue 3, p. 1-1
ISSN: 0048-5950
In: Latin American research review: LARR ; the journal of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), Volume 39, Issue 3, p. 9-28
ISSN: 0023-8791
This study examines the political and economic determinants of U.S. foreign direct investment (FDI) in Latin America. The analysis focuses on fifteen Latin American and Caribbean countries for the period of 1979 to 1996. Market size, workers' skill levels, and political instability are found to have a statistically significant effect on the investment behavior of U.S. multinational firms. In addition, we find that a poor human rights record and military coups d'etat positively influenced U.S. FDI flows during the time series.
BASE
In: Latin American research review, Volume 39, Issue 3, p. 9-28
ISSN: 1542-4278
In: State and Local Government Review, Volume 35, Issue 2, p. 112-122
ISSN: 1943-3409
In: Politics & policy: a publication of the Policy Studies Organization, Volume 31, Issue 2, p. 296-312
ISSN: 1555-5623
We develop a model to explain state adoption of death penalty exemptions for juveniles under age 18. Employing event history analysis, we find that internal factors are the primary determinants of juvenile exemptions. More specifically, we find that citizen ideology & death penalty support, as measured by the number on death row, provide explanatory power. Regional & temporal variables, on the other hand, appear to have little impact on state adoption of death penalty exemptions for those under age 18. 2 Tables, 1 Appendix, 27 References. Adapted from the source document.