Suchergebnisse

Bajo el enfoque de Foucault (1978, 2006, 2007 y 2008), este trabajo se propuso analizar conexiones entre elementos propios del Estado neoliberal colombiano, el cual, junto con la agencia de organismos internacionales y nacionales convirtió el reconocimiento de los derechos de las víctimas del Desplazamiento Forzado Interno en manejo social del riesgo, con miras a optimizar el gasto público y realizar una administración efectiva. El uso de la población como grilla para medir personas y grupos y hacerlos vulnerables, frágiles o bajo riesgo, medicaliza el conflicto social y político, sanitariza la vida social tal como Foucault (1978, 2006, 2007) y Fassin (2004, 2008) lo señalaron en asociación al Hacer de la Salud Publica. Estas prácticas de biopolítica, operan como preocupación por la extrema pobreza, producen el sujeto desplazado mediante el vínculo entre trauma, víctimas y vulnerabilidad. ; Under the Foucaultian approach (1978, 2006, 2007 and 2008), the present work proposes to analyze possible links between elements of the governmental neoliberal colombian state which, in conjunction with the agency of international and national organisms, turned the rights of the Forced Internal Displacement victims in practices such as social risk management with the purpose of optimizing public cost and effective economic administration. The use of population as the grid for measuring persons and groups to make them vulnerable, fragile or under risk medicalizes the socio-political conflict, and sanitarizes the social dimension of life as Foucault (1978, 2006, 2007, 2008) and Fassin (2004, 2008) have stated in association with the Making of Public Health. These practices that encounter several biopolitics, work as a concern for the life of extremely poor people, making possible the emergence of the displaced subject by uses of trauma, victims and vulnerability

La comarca de La Serranía (Valencia) se compone de un total de diecinueve municipios, cuyos términos agrupan y conforman un territorio rico en diversidad ambiental y en la presencia de un abundante patrimonio construido. Se concibe como un espacio de oportunidad sobre el que desarrollar la idea de este trabajo, un concepto que nació indeterminado y se ha ido perfilando con las últimas reformas legislativas: "Núcleos Históricos Tradicionales con categoría de Bienes de Relevancia Local". La protección del patrimonio arquitectónico en el medio rural nos ofrece la ocasión de salvaguardar el paisaje, garantizar la sostenibilidad medioambiental y contribuir a la salud de la arquitectura tradicional en su entorno histórico y actual. Se propone, así, alcanzar una actitud de compromiso y cooperación entre todos los agentes involucrados en este proceso de reconocimiento. Esta investigación arranca con el objetivo de explorar el valor del patrimonio urbanístico y arquitectónico en pueblos de pequeña escala, en torno a su núcleo primitivo, donde, seguramente, cada unidad de vivienda no constituye en sí misma un elemento de protección, pero que, en conjunto, pueden adquirir un carácter que merezca el interés de su tutela global. Estas son las trazas que impulsan este proceso de investigación hasta convertirlo en una metodología de trabajo cuyos resultados no se plantean como un final, sino como un comienzo, un nuevo modo de operar en aras de la salvaguarda del patrimonio cultural. ; Roger Espinosa, MF. (2015). NÚCLEOS HISTÓRICOS TRADICIONALES EN LA COMARCA DE LA SERRANÍA [Tesis doctoral no publicada]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/48548 ; TESIS

Este es un artículo de reflexión sobre los aportes de la noción de biopolítica de Michel Foucault, usados para interrogar algunas prácticas del ejercicio de la política pública. La pregunta que subyace es si las políticas y las prácticas de asistencia y de atención en salud mental a víctimas del desplazamiento podrían ser consideradas como dispositivos biopolíticos. Tanto en los discursos de la justicia y la equidad social como en el contexto del desplazamiento forzado, y enmarcados en la Sentencia T 025 de la Corte Constitucional, subyacen algunos efectos de las ciencias y saberes de la salud que podrían estar sustentando una práctica biopolítica. Concretamente, la medicalización de la sociedad y la intervención focalizada en individuos y poblaciones a través de la naturalización de nociones como trauma, riesgo, vulnerabilidad y salud mental en la atención a víctimas del desplazamiento forzado en Colombia. ; The purpose is to discuss under some premises of Foucault's biopolitics, governmental practices in the field of the contemporary dominium of public mental health. Within this epistemology, I would like to revise the emergence of the device of the Public Policy on mental health attention for forced internal displacement victims at Colombia in the past decade. Under the Sentencia T 025 the Colombian constitutional court obliges the government to recognize the existence of forced internal displacement and states mandatory the provision of mental health attention to victims. I suggest that this dominium of the public policy in mental health for victims of sociopolitical violence is a biopolitic exercise, where the devices mainly used in public mental health such as population and individuals act upon certain groups focalizing interventions. This mediation acts under the naturalization of trauma, vulnerability and risk, and has the final effect of the medicalization of society.

Abstract
This paper analyzes gender differences in student performance in Multiple-Choice Tests (MCT). We report evidence from a field experiment suggesting that, when MCT use a correction for guessing formula to obtain test scores, on average women tend to omit more items, get less correct answers and lower grades than men. We find that the gender difference in average test scores is concentrated at the upper tail of the distribution of scores. In addition, gender differences strongly depend on the framing of the scoring rule.

Decoupled direct payments were introduced in the European Union (EU) by the 2003 CAP reform in form of the Single Payment Scheme (SPS) and the Single Area Payment System (SAPS). The 2013 CAP reform changed both the implementation of decoupled payments as well as its budget. We assess the possible effects of the 2013 CAP reform on the capitalization of decoupled payments in land rental values. Our estimates suggest that the CAP reform leads to an increase in the capitalization of decoupled payments by additional 16 cents for each EUR of decoupled payments relative to the pre-reform situation. However, there is a relatively large variation in the reform effects between MS particularly between Old Member States (OMS) and New MS (NMS). In NMS the capitalization rate slightly reduces from 76% in the pre-reform period to 72% in the post-reform period. Although, the rate is significantly lower in OMS, it almost doubles (from 20% to 39%) due to the reform. The main source of the post-reform capitalization in the EU are the entitlement stock changes accounting for 19% of total post-reform capitalization level, followed by the internal convergence of payments with 18%, the budget change (including external convergence) with 1%, and the differentiation of payments (redistributive payment) with -7%. Overall, our estimates suggest that on average in the EU, the non-farming landowners' policy gains are 25% of total decoupled payments in the post-reform period compared to 17% in the pre-reform period.

International audience ; This paper assesses the farm-level impacts of trade liberalisation and CAP removal across EU using IFM-CAP (Individual Farm Model for CAP Analysis). IFM-CAP is a static positive programming model developed to capture the full heterogeneity of EU farms in terms of feedback to policy representation and impacts. Simulation results show that a small set of farm-types experience an increase in income due to the improvement in prices and yields (e.g. farms spe-cialised in granivores, milk and horticulture), while farms that are most CAP subsidy dependent (e.g. specialist cattle, specialist COP and small farms) lose income by more than 12% at aggregate EU level. As much as 77% of all farms lose income if CAP is removed , while the proportion of most income vulnerable farms almost doubles. ; Cet article évalue les impacts au niveau de l'exploitation agricole de la libéralisation du commerce et de la suppression de la PAC à travers l'UE en utilisant IFM-CAP (modèle de ferme individuel pour l'analyse de la PAC). IFM-CAP est un modèle de programmation positive statique développé pour prendre en compte la pleine hétérogénéité des exploitations agricoles de l'UE en termes de représentation et d'impact des politiques. Les résultats de la simulation montrent qu'un petit ensemble d'exploitation agricole type enregistre une augmentation de revenu en raison de l'amélioration des prix et des rendements (par exemple, les exploitations spécialisées dans les granivores, le lait et l'horticulture), tandis que les exploitations qui dépendent le plus de la PAC (par exemple celles spécialisées en bovins et en COP et les petites exploitations) perdent plus de 12% des revenus au niveau agrégé de l'UE. Jusqu'à 77% de toutes les exploitations agricoles perdent des revenus si la PAC est supprimée, tandis que la proportion des exploitations agricoles les plus vulnérables double.

International audience ; This paper assesses the farm-level impacts of trade liberalisation and CAP removal across EU using IFM-CAP (Individual Farm Model for CAP Analysis). IFM-CAP is a static positive programming model developed to capture the full heterogeneity of EU farms in terms of feedback to policy representation and impacts. Simulation results show that a small set of farm-types experience an increase in income due to the improvement in prices and yields (e.g. farms spe-cialised in granivores, milk and horticulture), while farms that are most CAP subsidy dependent (e.g. specialist cattle, specialist COP and small farms) lose income by more than 12% at aggregate EU level. As much as 77% of all farms lose income if CAP is removed , while the proportion of most income vulnerable farms almost doubles. ; Cet article évalue les impacts au niveau de l'exploitation agricole de la libéralisation du commerce et de la suppression de la PAC à travers l'UE en utilisant IFM-CAP (modèle de ferme individuel pour l'analyse de la PAC). IFM-CAP est un modèle de programmation positive statique développé pour prendre en compte la pleine hétérogénéité des exploitations agricoles de l'UE en termes de représentation et d'impact des politiques. Les résultats de la simulation montrent qu'un petit ensemble d'exploitation agricole type enregistre une augmentation de revenu en raison de l'amélioration des prix et des rendements (par exemple, les exploitations spécialisées dans les granivores, le lait et l'horticulture), tandis que les exploitations qui dépendent le plus de la PAC (par exemple celles spécialisées en bovins et en COP et les petites exploitations) perdent plus de 12% des revenus au niveau agrégé de l'UE. Jusqu'à 77% de toutes les exploitations agricoles perdent des revenus si la PAC est supprimée, tandis que la proportion des exploitations agricoles les plus vulnérables double.

International audience ; This paper assesses the farm-level impacts of trade liberalisation and CAP removal across EU using IFM-CAP (Individual Farm Model for CAP Analysis). IFM-CAP is a static positive programming model developed to capture the full heterogeneity of EU farms in terms of feedback to policy representation and impacts. Simulation results show that a small set of farm-types experience an increase in income due to the improvement in prices and yields (e.g. farms spe-cialised in granivores, milk and horticulture), while farms that are most CAP subsidy dependent (e.g. specialist cattle, specialist COP and small farms) lose income by more than 12% at aggregate EU level. As much as 77% of all farms lose income if CAP is removed , while the proportion of most income vulnerable farms almost doubles. ; Cet article évalue les impacts au niveau de l'exploitation agricole de la libéralisation du commerce et de la suppression de la PAC à travers l'UE en utilisant IFM-CAP (modèle de ferme individuel pour l'analyse de la PAC). IFM-CAP est un modèle de programmation positive statique développé pour prendre en compte la pleine hétérogénéité des exploitations agricoles de l'UE en termes de représentation et d'impact des politiques. Les résultats de la simulation montrent qu'un petit ensemble d'exploitation agricole type enregistre une augmentation de revenu en raison de l'amélioration des prix et des rendements (par exemple, les exploitations spécialisées dans les granivores, le lait et l'horticulture), tandis que les exploitations qui dépendent le plus de la PAC (par exemple celles spécialisées en bovins et en COP et les petites exploitations) perdent plus de 12% des revenus au niveau agrégé de l'UE. Jusqu'à 77% de toutes les exploitations agricoles perdent des revenus si la PAC est supprimée, tandis que la proportion des exploitations agricoles les plus vulnérables double.