Suchergebnisse

Introduction: Rethinking relocation in apartheid South Africa -- Part 1. Regimes of relocation -- Apartheid, the bantustans and the end of empire -- Peace, population and colonial development, c.1920-1945 -- The 'late colonial' apartheid state -- Cold war in southern Africa: villagisation and counterinsurgency -- Regimes of relocation in the Ciskei -- The Cape as apartheid test case -- The relocation regime -- Villagisation and repression -- Decolonisation, repatriation and resettlement -- The expansion of Sada and Ilinge -- White farmers and relocation -- Part 2. Repertoires of relocation -- Dislocation and disrupted livelihoods: removals, evictions and banishments -- The coercive relocation regime -- The biopolitics of neglect -- Displacement and marginal livelihoods -- Farm evictions: enclosure and dispossession -- Urban removals: dislocation and deprivation -- Political banishment: surveillance and isolation -- 'We were starving. And we survived': gender, domesticity and displacement -- Farm dwellers and relocation: gender, generation and agrarian change -- Farm labour and agrarian change -- Gender, generation and changing men -- Changing livelihoods and the transformation of aspirations -- Migration, male breadwinners and masculinity -- Gender, autonomy and impoverishment: the paradoxical impacts of relocation -- Part 3. Place, space and power -- 'We came from different places': displacement and place-making -- Forced removals and 'communities of memory' -- The emergence of underground networks in Sada and Ilinge -- Churches, spirituality and sociability -- Poverty, survival and reciprocity -- Relocation and the state: relations of rule -- Territoriality and the gendered disciplinary project of the BAD, c. 1963-71 -- Ethnic politics, clientelism and coercion under Ciskei, c.1971-80.

AbstractU.S. national policies toward Native Americans followed a zig-zag path of change from 1889 to 1970. How do we explain policymakers' unsteady attraction to the rights of Native Nations? I argue that in precarious circumstances, Native Americans forged interest-based political coalitions with non-Native American western rural interests. At times, this cross-racial, interest-based coalition successfully challenged the power of non-Native American eastern ideologues. These findings advance our understanding of the interplay of race and federalism. Also, these findings illustrate the unique importance of Native Nations for American political development. This article presents quantitative and qualitative analyses of a new dataset on federal Indian policy. It also reviews existing historical scholarship.

By analyzing the politics of Indigenous peoples in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, political scientists gain new perspectives on power and powerlessness. Such study offers a new vantage point on pathways of exclusion and regulation, as well as on the pathways of challenging inequity. It illustrates how beliefs and identity configure and reconfigure power. I highlight research from four domains of research on Indigenous politics: studies of political advocacy, political attitudes, rules of the game, and the public good. Political science research on Indigenous peoples fits comfortably within the discipline. It is flush with ideas that draw on and speak to other theories of politics.Were political science to broaden its perspective and recognize the insights available from the racial minority groups and indigenous nations regarding the manner in which law and political institutions channel energies of distinct groups and create, in their application of discriminatory policies, responses and reactions manifest in other areas of life, it could embark on a broadening of its offerings and clientele.Deloria & Wilkins (1999)

By analyzing the politics of Indigenous peoples in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, political scientists gain new perspectives on power and powerlessness. Such study offers a new vantage point on pathways of exclusion and regulation, as well as on the pathways of challenging inequity. It illustrates how beliefs and identity configure and reconfigure power. I highlight research from four domains of research on Indigenous politics: studies of political advocacy, political attitudes, rules of the game, and the public good. Political science research on Indigenous peoples fits comfortably within the discipline. It is flush with ideas that draw on and speak to other theories of politics. Adapted from the source document.