Suchergebnisse

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking and smoke exposure during pregnancy and childhood cause considerable childhood morbidity and mortality. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether implementation of WHO's recommended tobacco control policies (MPOWER) was of benefit to perinatal and child health. METHODS: We searched 19 electronic databases, hand-searched references and citations, and consulted experts to identify studies assessing the association between implementation of MPOWER policies and child health. We did not apply any language restrictions, and searched the full time period available for each database, up to June 22, 2017. Our primary outcomes of interest were perinatal mortality, preterm birth, hospital attendance for asthma exacerbations, and hospital attendance for respiratory tract infections. Where possible and appropriate, we combined data from different studies in random-effects meta-analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42015023448. FINDINGS: We identified 41 eligible studies (24 from North America, 16 from Europe, and one from China) that assessed combinations of the following MPOWER policies: smoke-free legislation (n=35), tobacco taxation (n=11), and smoking cessation services (n=3). Risk of bias was low in 23 studies, moderate in 16, and high in two. Implementation of smoke-free legislation was associated with reductions in rates of preterm birth (-3·77% [95% CI -6·37 to -1·16]; ten studies, 27 530 183 individuals), rates of hospital attendance for asthma exacerbations (-9·83% [-16·62 to -3·04]; five studies, 684 826 events), and rates of hospital attendance for all respiratory tract infections (-3·45% [-4·64 to -2·25]; two studies, 1 681 020 events) and for lower respiratory tract infections (-18·48% [-32·79 to -4·17]; three studies, 887 414 events). Associations appeared to be stronger when comprehensive smoke-free laws were implemented than when partial smoke-free laws were implemented. Among two studies assessing the association between smoke-free legislation and perinatal mortality, one showed significant reductions in stillbirth and neonatal mortality but did not report the overall effect on perinatal mortality, while the other showed no change in perinatal mortality. Meta-analysis of studies on other MPOWER policies was not possible; all four studies on increasing tobacco taxation and one of two on offering disadvantaged pregnant women help to quit smoking that reported on our primary outcomes had positive findings. Assessment of publication bias was only possible for studies assessing the association between smoke-free legislation and preterm birth, showing some degree of bias. INTERPRETATION: Smoke-free legislation is associated with substantial benefits to child health. The majority of studies on other MPOWER policies also indicated a positive effect. These findings provide strong support for implementation of such policies comprehensively across the world. FUNDING: Chief Scientist Office Scotland, Farr Institute, Netherlands Lung Foundation, Erasmus MC.

Background Comprehensive tobacco control policies can help to protect children from tobacco smoke exposure and associated adverse respiratory health consequences. We investigated the impact of England's 2015 regulation that prohibits smoking in a private vehicle with children present on changes in environmental tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory health in children. Methods In this quasi-experimental study, we used repeated cross-sectional, nationally representative data from the Health Survey for England from Jan 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2017, of children aged up to 15 years. We did interrupted time series logistic or ordinal regression analyses to assess changes in prevalence of self-reported respiratory conditions, prevalence of self-reported childhood tobacco smoke exposure (children aged 8–15 years only), and salivary cotinine levels (children aged 2 years or older) before and after implementation of the smoke-free private vehicle regulation on Oct 1, 2015. Children who were considered active smokers were excluded from the analyses of salivary cotinine levels. Our primary outcome of interest was self-reported current wheezing or asthma, defined as having medicines prescribed for these conditions. Analyses were adjusted for underlying time trends, quarter of year, sex, age, Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile, and urbanisation level. Findings 21 096 children aged 0–15 years were included in our dataset. Implementation of the smoke-free private vehicle regulation was not associated with a demonstrable change in self-reported current wheezing or asthma (adjusted odds ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·62–1·05; p=0·108; assessed in 13 369 children), respiratory conditions (1·02, 0·80–1·29; p=0·892; assessed in 17 006 children), or respiratory conditions probably affecting stamina, breathing, or fatigue (0·75, 0·47–1·19; p=0·220; assessed in 12 386 children). Self-reported tobacco smoke exposure and salivary cotinine levels generally decreased over the study period. There was no additional change in self-reported tobacco smoke exposure in cars among children aged 8–15 years following the legislation (0·77, 0·51–1·17; p=0·222; assessed in 5399 children). We observed a relative increase in the odds of children having detec

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive tobacco control policies can help to protect children from tobacco smoke exposure and associated adverse respiratory health consequences. We investigated the impact of England's 2015 regulation that prohibits smoking in a private vehicle with children present on changes in environmental tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory health in children. METHODS: In this quasi-experimental study, we used repeated cross-sectional, nationally representative data from the Health Survey for England from Jan 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2017, of children aged up to 15 years. We did interrupted time series logistic or ordinal regression analyses to assess changes in prevalence of self-reported respiratory conditions, prevalence of self-reported childhood tobacco smoke exposure (children aged 8-15 years only), and salivary cotinine levels (children aged 2 years or older) before and after implementation of the smoke-free private vehicle regulation on Oct 1, 2015. Children who were considered active smokers were excluded from the analyses of salivary cotinine levels. Our primary outcome of interest was self-reported current wheezing or asthma, defined as having medicines prescribed for these conditions. Analyses were adjusted for underlying time trends, quarter of year, sex, age, Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile, and urbanisation level. FINDINGS: 21 096 children aged 0-15 years were included in our dataset. Implementation of the smoke-free private vehicle regulation was not associated with a demonstrable change in self-reported current wheezing or asthma (adjusted odds ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·62-1·05; p=0·108; assessed in 13 369 children), respiratory conditions (1·02, 0·80-1·29; p=0·892; assessed in 17 006 children), or respiratory conditions probably affecting stamina, breathing, or fatigue (0·75, 0·47-1·19; p=0·220; assessed in 12 386 children). Self-reported tobacco smoke exposure and salivary cotinine levels generally decreased over the study period. There was no additional change in self-reported tobacco smoke exposure in cars among children aged 8-15 years following the legislation (0·77, 0·51-1·17; p=0·222; assessed in 5399 children). We observed a relative increase in the odds of children having detectable salivary cotinine levels post legislation (1·36, 1·09-1·71; p=0·0074; assessed in 7858 children) and levels were also higher (1·30, 1·04-1·62; p=0·020; ordinal variable). Despite introduction of the regulation, one in 20 children still reported being regularly exposed to tobacco smoke in cars and one in three still had detectable salivary cotinine levels. INTERPRETATION: We found no demonstrable association between the implementation of England's smoke-free private vehicle regulation and changes in children's self-reported tobacco smoke exposure or respiratory health. There is an urgent need to develop more effective approaches to protect children from tobacco smoke in various places, including in private vehicles. FUNDING: Netherlands Lung Foundation, Erasmus MC, Farr Institute, Health Data Research UK, Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Academy of Medical Sciences, and Newton Fund.