Suchergebnisse

ClaimsKG is a knowledge graph of metadata information for 59580 fact-checked claims scraped from 13 fact-checking sites. In addition to providing a single dataset of claims and associated metadata, truth ratings are harmonised and additional information is provided for each claim, e.g., about mentioned entities. Please see (https://data.gesis.org/claimskg/) for further details about the data model and statistics.

The dataset facilitates structured queries about claims, their truth values, involved entities, authors, dates, and other kinds of metadata. ClaimsKG is generated through a (semi-)automated pipeline, which harvests claim-related data from popular fact-checking web sites, annotates them with related entities from DBpedia/Wikipedia, and lifts all data to RDF using established vocabularies (such as schema.org). 

The latest release of ClaimsKG covers 59580 claims. The data was scraped till August, of 2022 containing claims published between the years 1996-2022 from 13 factchecking websites. The claim-review (fact checking) period for claims ranges between the year 1996 to 2022. Entity fishing python client (https://github.com/hirmeos/entity-fishing-client-python) has been used for entity linking and disambiguation in this release. The dataset contains a total of 1371271 entities detected and referenced with DBpedia. More information, such as detailed statistics, query examples and a user-friendly interface to explore the knowledge graph is available at: https://data.gesis.org/claimskg/ .

The first two releases of ClaimsKG are hosted at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3518960), ClaimsKGV1.0 (published on 04.04.2019), ClaimsKGV2.0 (published on 01.09.2019). This latest release of ClaimsKG supersedes the previous versions as it contains all the claims from the previous versions together with additional claims as well as improved entity annotations.

TweetsCOV19 is a semantically annotated corpus of Tweets about the COVID-19 pandemic. It is a subset of TweetsKB and aims at capturing online discourse about various aspects of the pandemic and its societal impact. Metadata information about the tweets as well as extracted entities, sentiments, hashtags, user mentions, and resolved URLs are exposed in RDF using established RDF/S vocabularies (for the sake of privacy, we anonymize user IDs and we do not provide the text of the tweets). More information are available through TweetsCOV19's home page: https://data.gesis.org/tweetscov19/.

We also provide a tab-separated values (tsv) version of the dataset. Each line contains features of a tweet instance. Features are separated by tab character ("\t"). The following list indicate the feature indices:

1. Tweet Id: Long.

2. Username: String. Encrypted for privacy issues.

3. Timestamp: Format ( "EEE MMM dd HH:mm:ss Z yyyy" ).

4. #Followers: Integer.

5. #Friends: Integer.

6. #Retweets: Integer.

7. #Favorites: Integer.

8. Entities: String. For each entity, we aggregated the original text, the annotated entity and the produced score from FEL library. Each entity is separated from another entity by char ";". Also, each entity is separated by char ":" in order to store "original_text:annotated_entity:score;". If FEL did not find any entities, we have stored "null;".

9. Sentiment: String. SentiStrength produces a score for positive (1 to 5) and negative (-1 to -5) sentiment. We splitted these two numbers by whitespace char " ". Positive sentiment was stored first and then negative sentiment (i.e. "2 -1").

10. Mentions: String. If the tweet contains mentions, we remove the char "@" and concatenate the mentions with whitespace char " ". If no mentions appear, we have stored "null;".

11. Hashtags: String. If the tweet contains hashtags, we remove the char "#" and concatenate the hashtags with whitespace char " ". If no hashtags appear, we have stored "null;".

12. URLs: String: If the tweet contains URLs, we concatenate the URLs using ":-: ". If no URLs appear, we have stored "null;"

To extract the dataset from TweetsKB, we compiled a seed list of 268 COVID-19-related keywords.

You can find the previous part 3 at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4593523 .

ClaimsKG is a knowledge graph of metadata information for fact-checked claims scraped from popular fact-checking sites. In addition to providing a single dataset of claims and associated metadata, truth ratings are harmonized and additional information is provided for each claim, e.g., about mentioned entities. Please see (https://data.gesis.org/claimskg/) for further details about the data model, query examples and statistics.

The dataset facilitates structured queries about claims, their truth values, involved entities, authors, dates, and other kinds of metadata. ClaimsKG is generated through a (semi-)automated pipeline, which harvests claim-related data from popular fact-checking web sites, annotates them with related entities from DBpedia/Wikipedia, and lifts all data to RDF using established vocabularies (such as schema.org).

The latest release of ClaimsKG covers 74066 claims and 72127 Claim Reviews. This is the fourth release of the dataset where data was scraped till Jan 31, 2023 containing claims published between 1996 and 2023 from 13 fact-checking websites. The websites are Fullfact, Politifact, TruthOrFiction, Checkyourfact, Vishvanews, AFP (French), AFP, Polygraph, EU factcheck, Factograph, Fatabyyano, Snopes and Africacheck. The claim-review (fact-checking) period for claims ranges between the year 1996 to 2023. Similar to the previous release, the Entity fishing python client (https://github.com/hirmeos/entity-fishing-client-python) has been used for entity linking and disambiguation in this release. Improvements have been made in the web scraping and data preprocessing pipeline to extract more entities from both claims and claims reviews. Currently, ClaimsKG contains 3408386 entities detected and referenced with DBpedia.

This latest release of ClaimsKG supersedes the previous versions as it contained all the claims from the previous versions together in addition to the additional new claims as well as improved entity annotation resulting in a higher number of entities.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based systems are widely employed nowadays to make decisions that have far-reaching impact on individuals and society. Their decisions might affect everyone, everywhere, and anytime, entailing concerns about potential human rights issues. Therefore, it is necessary to move beyond traditional AI algorithms optimized for predictive performance and embed ethical and legal principles in their design, training, and deployment to ensure social good while still benefiting from the huge potential of the AI technology. The goal of this survey is to provide a broad multidisciplinary overview of the area of bias in AI systems, focusing on technical challenges and solutions as well as to suggest new research directions towards approaches well-grounded in a legal frame. In this survey, we focus on data-driven AI, as a large part of AI is powered nowadays by (big) data and powerful machine learning algorithms. If otherwise not specified, we use the general term bias to describe problems related to the gathering or processing of data that might result in prejudiced decisions on the bases of demographic features such as race, sex, and so forth. This article is categorized under: Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Fairness in Data Mining Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Ethical Considerations Commercial, Legal, and Ethical Issues > Legal Issues. © 2020 The Authors. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.