The government of China under Mongolian rule: a reference guide
In: Münchener ostasiatische Studien 53
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Münchener ostasiatische Studien 53
In: Pacific affairs, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 521
ISSN: 0030-851X
In: Pacific affairs, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 521
ISSN: 0030-851X
In: The China quarterly, Band 30, S. 79-92
ISSN: 1468-2648
Chinese Communist evaluations of China's foreign conquest dynasties, like those of earlier Chinese historians, have been hostile, at least on the most vulgar level of historical writing. This comes as no surprise, for the conquest dynasties occupied all or part of China by military force and often governed badly. For the Chinese Communist historians these conquerors carry the additional onus of being feudalists, or worse, feudalists who allowed the feudal economy to stagnate. This attitude is particularly marked in the treatment of the more recent foreign dynasties, the Khitan Liao dynasty (916–1124), the Jurchen Chin dynasty (1115–1234), the Tangut Hsi Hsia dynasty (1032–1227), the Manchu Ch'ing dynasty (1644–1911) and the one discussed here, the Mongol Yüan dynasty (1220–1367).
In: Pacific affairs: an international review of Asia and the Pacific, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 521
ISSN: 1715-3379