22 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Canadian Slavonic papers: an interdisciplinary journal devoted to Central and Eastern Europe, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 108-116
ISSN: 2375-2475
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 340-341
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 318-319
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Canadian Slavonic papers: an interdisciplinary journal devoted to Central and Eastern Europe, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 301-313
ISSN: 2375-2475
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 37, Heft 4, S. 730-731
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Canadian Slavonic papers: an interdisciplinary journal devoted to Central and Eastern Europe, Band 20, Heft sup1, S. 45-59
ISSN: 2375-2475
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 574-582
ISSN: 2325-7784
In discussing the contribution of the Polish "Formal" or "Integral" School to the development of literary research, one of the difficulties is whether to view it mainly as an echo of Russian Formalism or as a scholarly movement in its own right. There is no doubt that the often strikingly suggestive theoretical slogans and undeniable practical achievements of the Russian Formalists—such as Shklovsky's insights on the theory of the novel, V. I. Propp's Morphology of the Folktale, M. A. Petrovsky's Morphology of the Short Story, and the research of Boris Tomashevsky, Viktor Zhirmunsky, and Roman Jakobson in the field of poetry—all greatly attracted those Polish scholars who were looking for a coherent, strictly literary set of criteria, discouraged as they were by the inflation of biographism and psychologism in literary research. Yet the impact of Russian Formalism was limited in scope and in many respects rather indirect. On the one hand, the reaction against the one-sidedness of the psychological school came in Poland independently, and in some ways even earlier than in Russia. For this the Polish scholars did not need to go to Russia—they had both ancient (Aristotle) and more modern sources (German, Italian, French, and others). On the other hand, many of the Polish scholars did not even know the Russian language, though they knew some Western languages very well. (The scholar who was to become the foremost promoter of Formalism, Manfred Kridl, knew very little Russian when he came to teach at the University of Wilno. It was under the influence and with the help of a group of students that he became familiar with the writings of the Formalists.)
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 740-741
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 710-710
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 445-446
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 97-98
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Slavic review: interdisciplinary quarterly of Russian, Eurasian and East European studies, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 358-359
ISSN: 2325-7784
In: Canadian Slavonic papers: an interdisciplinary journal devoted to Central and Eastern Europe, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 111-113
ISSN: 2375-2475
In: American Slavic and East European Review, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 216
In: American Slavic and East European Review, Band 14, Heft 3, S. 422