Changing bushfire management practices to incorporate diverse values of the public
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 125, S. 87-95
ISSN: 1462-9011
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 125, S. 87-95
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 124, S. 656-664
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 81, S. 131-142
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Society and natural resources, Band 34, Heft 12, S. 1527-1545
ISSN: 1521-0723
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 25, Heft 4
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 23, Heft 4
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: International journal of sustainable development & world ecology, Band 30, Heft 5, S. 548-563
ISSN: 1745-2627
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 139, S. 1-13
World Affairs Online
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 106, S. 201-209
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 91, S. 104285
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: Environment and behavior: eb ; publ. in coop. with the Environmental Design Research Association, Band 46, Heft 4, S. 476-506
ISSN: 1552-390X
In this study, the authors develop a model of the formation of public acceptability judgments. The model suggests that in judging environmental management, people apply their values for the natural environment through psychological processes involving beliefs, aesthetic experience, and trust. A key aim of the study was to explore relationships among these processes. Through a mail survey, 487 Australians judged the acceptability of forest landscape management in Southern Tasmania. Structural equation modeling with these data provided general support for the model, confirming that all of the psychological processes are significant in the formation of acceptability judgments. The most important factor was found to be beliefs about consequences for the natural environment. A new finding to emerge from exploration of the model is that aesthetic experience is informed by values, particularly use/intrinsic values for nature, and in turn influences acceptability judgments mainly by influencing beliefs about consequences for the natural environment.
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 44, Heft 6, S. 1149-1162
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 117, S. 196-210
World Affairs Online