Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote: Reflections on an Embedded Institution
In: Public choice, Band 107, Heft 3-4, S. 403-406
ISSN: 0048-5829
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public choice, Band 107, Heft 3-4, S. 403-406
ISSN: 0048-5829
In: Public choice, Band 107, Heft 3, S. 403-406
ISSN: 0048-5829
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
In: NBER Working Paper No. w26404
SSRN
Working paper
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP14085
SSRN
In: NBER Working Paper No. w24921
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: American journal of political science, Band 52, Heft 4, S. 891-909
ISSN: 1540-5907
The introduction of mandatory gender quotas in party lists is a reform that many countries have recently adopted or have been considering. The electoral system affects the incumbents' incentives to make such reforms, their details, and their effectiveness. We show that male incumbents can actually expect an increased incumbency advantage when gender quotas are introduced, if they are elected through single-member district majority rule. On the other hand, no expectation of male advantage can reduce the incumbents' fear of being replaced if they are elected through closed-list proportional representation. As France has both electoral systems, we validate the above argument using a formal model of constitutional design as well as an empirical analysis of the legislative elections in France, displaying the existence of male bias in the last three elections. We also show that parity may have Assembly composition effects and policy effects that vary with the electoral system. Adapted from the source document.
In: Handbooks of Economic Methodology Ser.
In: Bravo Working Paper # 2020-017
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: American political science review, Band 97, Heft 2, S. 221-232
ISSN: 0003-0554
We investigate the differential effects of open vs closed amendment rules within the framework of a distributive model of legislative bargaining. The data show that there are longer delays in distributing benefits & a more egalitarian distribution of benefits under the open amendment rule, the proposer gets a larger share of the benefits than coalition members under both rules, & play converges toward minimal winning coalitions under the closed amendment rule. However, there are important quantitative differences between the theoretical model underlying the experiment (Baron & Ferejohn, 1989) & data, as the frequency of minimal winning coalitions is much greater under the closed rule (the theory predicts minimal winning coalitions under both rules for our parameter values) & the distribution of benefits between coalition members is much more egalitarian than predicted. The latter are consistent with findings from shrinking pie bilateral bargaining game experiments in economics, to which we relate our results. 2 Tables, 4 Figures, 23 References. Adapted from the source document.