Foreword — Police Misconduct and Kibbe v. City of Springfield
In: Western New England Law Review, Band 40, S. 393
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Western New England Law Review, Band 40, S. 393
SSRN
In: Labor history, Band 53, Heft 2, S. 312-314
ISSN: 1469-9702
In: Western New England University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-2
SSRN
In: INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF REVOLUTION AND PROTEST, pp. 3411-3415, Immanual Ness, ed., 2009
SSRN
In: Working USA: the journal of labor & society, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 1-8
ISSN: 1743-4580
In: Working USA: The Journal of Labor and Society, Band 11, S. 1
SSRN
In: Working USA: the journal of labor & society, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 133-139
ISSN: 1743-4580
In: Working USA: the journal of labor & society, Band 8, Heft 5, S. 643-648
ISSN: 1743-4580
In: The national interest, Heft 55, S. 42-46
ISSN: 0884-9382
World Affairs Online
In: The national interest, Heft 55, S. 42-46
ISSN: 0884-9382
SSRN
Working paper
In: Working USA: the journal of labor & society, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 293-314
ISSN: 1743-4580
This article presents a historical and legal argument for reclassifying and regulating commercial staffing agencies as labor market intermediaries. Their current legal classification as employers is a major factor contributing to the exploitation of temps. The article contrasts the deregulated environment for commercial staffing agencies with the extensive federal regulation of union hiring halls. Because these two institutions serve a similar function—providing access to the job market for short‐term employees—both should be subject to comparable regulatory regimes in order to restore parity in the legal treatment of temporary employees by all parties to the employment relationship. A regulatory regime should impose on temporary help and staffing agencies a level of transparency and fiduciary obligations analogous to the duty of fair representation imposed on union hiring halls by federal labor law. Absent such legal reclassification, the staffing industry will remain unfairly privileged in the marketplace in a way that prevents fair treatment and representation for temps.
This report advocates for the Massachusetts Legislature to pass the Fairness for Farmworkers Act (FFA) to end the second-class treatment of farmworkers under the state's current wage and hour law. The bill has three essential parts: First, the FFA repeals the $8.00 substandard minimum wage for agricultural and farm work. All farmworkers will be paid the state minimum wage. Second, the FFA provides overtime pay for all farmworkers. Seasonal farmworkers will receive one and a half times their normal rate of pay for work performed in excess of fifty-five (55) hours in a week. Year-round farmworkers, like other hourly employees, will receive time and a half for all hours worked in excess of forty (40). Third, the FFA establishes the right to a day of rest each week for seasonal farmworkers and provides overtime pay at time and a half for workers who elect to work on that day of rest. The report argues that The Fairness for Farmworkers Act makes the farmworkers' minimum wage the same as all other essential workers in the food supply chain – e.g., meat packers, food processors and grocery store workers. It recognizes the dignity, diligence, skill and hard work of these essential workers.
BASE
In: The Second Draft (The Legal Writing Institute), p. 2, November 1999
SSRN