Afterword
In: Journal for early modern cultural studies: JEMCS ; official publication of the Group for Early Modern Cultural Studies, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 141-143
ISSN: 1553-3786
Abstract: What happens when you "tear up, or at least forcefully wrinkle, the Eurocentric map of the early modern World-Ocean," and instead "mark the interrelation between ecological and cultural geographies in ways that are attentive to the interdependence of local and networked perspectives," as editors Jane Degenhardt and Benjamin VanWagoner provocatively advise in their introduction (3)? To judge from this remarkably cogent collection, the paradoxical result is to show how careful attention to the local can simultaneously inform and disrupt larger narratives. I catch myself even as I write this, reluctant to measure the import of these interventions by what they tell us about imperialism in general, or beyond their specific cases. The generalizing or theorizing impulse may unwittingly reinscribe the centrality of a European experience writ large, which is precisely what the issue sets out to disrupt, by "bringing to light absent, suppressed, or unconventional narratives, histories of cultural forms and oceanic relations" (Degenhardt and Ben VanWagoner 3). Yet these contributions manage both to illuminate the contested agencies that operate at sites of cultural and imperial encounter, and how everything from material culture to marriage choices refracts those contestations, while simultaneously offering powerful models for understanding dynamics elsewhere.