Critique on a Critic: An Analysis of a 'Case Study'
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 13, Heft 3
ISSN: 0033-362X
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 13, Heft 3
ISSN: 0033-362X
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 462
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 736
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: Handbook of Transport and the Environment; Handbooks in Transport, S. 203-225
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 213, Heft 1, S. 54-61
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: Zero Carbon Action Plan (2020)
SSRN
At the current stage of plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) market development, sales rates vary dramatically across different countries and regions. For policy-makers and other stakeholders it is useful to understand the major social, economic, and policy drivers of vehicle adoption. This paper provides insights into the developing PEV markets in Norway, Netherlands, California, United States, France, Japan, and Germany. This is accomplished by applying a Technological Innovation System (TIS) approach that systematically identifies the role of different factors in promulgating new markets. Our comparison between markets shows that in all studied regions, sales of PEVs are supported through various types of government incentives, government resources, and other legitimation activities. However, regions with relatively strong PEV markets have a greater focus on market formation activities and relatively higher costs savings associated with operating an electric vehicle as compared to a conventional vehicle. To determine whether these factors are the primary determinants of PEV market shares, further research should be undertaken that also incorporates analysis related to the presence and government support for entrepreneurial activities related to electric vehicle innovation.
BASE
SSRN
In: RSER-D-22-02898
SSRN
In: Review of policy research, Band 38, Heft 5, S. 596-630
ISSN: 1541-1338
AbstractWe compare flexible low‐carbon regulations in the transportation sector and their interaction and sequencing with greenhouse gas emissions trading systems in California and Quebec. As momentum builds for greater climate action, it is necessary to better understand how carbon markets and other low‐carbon transportation policies influence one another. First, we demonstrate that emissions trading between California and Quebec has been asymmetric, with linking having little influence on carbon prices from California's perspective but leading to a considerable cost reduction from the point of view of Quebec. Second, we present evidence that Quebec has replicated many of California's low‐carbon transportation policies that promote increased electric vehicle use, where Quebec has an advantage, while deferring to the Canadian federal government with regard to policies that incentivize the production of other low‐carbon transportation fuels. Third, we demonstrate that while the stringency of the policy mix of carbon pricing and flexible transportation regulations has increased over time in both jurisdictions, the stringency of flexible regulations has been more aggressively ratcheted up and is expected to continue to dominate. Overall, our findings suggest that the policy sequence observed in California and Quebec can be attributed to the political economy benefits that the selected instruments confer to governments seeking to move from the middle towards the bottom of the clean technology experience curve. We discuss a number of important research questions and associated hypotheses emanating from our findings, which provide the basis for more in‐depth studies involving a larger universe of cases and economic sectors.