Intra-EU labour migration: flows, effects and policy responses
In: Working paper / ETUI 2009,03
42 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Working paper / ETUI 2009,03
In: South-East Europe review for labour and social affairs 10.2007,3
In: Transfer: the European review of labour and research ; quarterly review of the European Trade Union Institute, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 349-366
ISSN: 1996-7284
This article will demonstrate that, given the complexity of inequalities in the climate-environment-social nexus, fragmented policies for a just transition that focus on only one dimension of inequality will not deliver the results needed to justify proclaiming a 'just transition for all'. By reframing the sustainability trilemma for the case of the climate emergency and deconstructing the concept of a 'just transition' based on the relevant literature and selected case studies, we shall highlight some of the concept's inherent contradictions. The article will argue that a holistic approach requires a reframing of the role of the welfare state.
The Eastern EU enlargement (2004, 2007, 2013) is still one of the success stories of the EU (and unprecedented in the world), but at the same time it is controversial and is perceived as controversial. One of the core problems has been its unbalanced character: the whole process had a clear `Single Market` focus and the values of a `Social Europe` were of secondary importance. Based on a neofunctionalist approach the paper discusses the integration of the new member states from the point of view of economic and income convergence. Along with a literature review, data on wages, productivity and output will be analysed to demonstrate that upward convergence of the poorer new member states towards the EU average had been stalled in wake of the 2009 crisis. The resulting cleavages put the core hypothesis of the neofunctionalist approach - that EU integration has a `direction` in terms of an upwards convergence - into question.
BASE
In: An Elusive Target: The EU Perspective of the Western Balkans, S. 222-233
In: SEER: journal for labour and social affairs in Eastern Europe, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 27-37
ISSN: 1435-2869
In: Gaceta sindical: reflexión y debate, Heft 18, S. 149-164
ISSN: 1133-035X
In: Journal of contemporary European research: JCER, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 614-625
ISSN: 1815-347X
This commentary shows the patterns of a production model in Central Eastern Europe (CEE) that was based on a specific division of labour within the enlarged Europe. Its foundation was a newly emerged manufacturing base in Central Eastern Europe (CEE) and it was seen as a prerequisite for economic renewal in post-communist countries. This production model seems to be in danger now. The first section highlights the main elements of the process where CEE production locations became integrated into the value chains of western European manufacturing enterprises. The example of the automobile industry demonstrates the principles of this production model of with its particular pattern of division of labour between the East and west of Europe. The foundations of the past success have however proved to be fragile, as the dramatic effects of the economic crisis show us these days. The second part of the paper shows, how the particular pattern of the division of labour between East and West have become a risk factor and its sustainability is being questioned.
In: South-East Europe review for labour and social affairs: SEER ; quarterly of the Hans Böckler Foundation, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 21-31
ISSN: 1435-2869
World Affairs Online
In: South-East Europe review for labour and social affairs: SEER ; quarterly of the Hans Böckler Foundation, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 23-33
In: Gaceta sindical: reflexión y debate, Heft 13, S. 131-148
ISSN: 1133-035X
In: Transfer: the European review of labour and research ; quarterly review of the European Trade Union Institute, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 330-332
ISSN: 1996-7284