Suchergebnisse
Filter
38 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Legal Evolution and the 1951 Refugee Convention
In: International Migration, Band 59
SSRN
Legal evolution and the 1951 Refugee Convention
In: International migration: quarterly review, Band 59, Heft 4, S. 257-260
ISSN: 1468-2435
World Affairs Online
The Do-Gooders' Dilemma: Scandinavian Asylum and Migration Policies in the Aftermath of 2015
In: (Book chapter, forthcoming in Puyvallée and Bjørkdahl (eds.), Do-Gooders at the End of Aid: Scandinavian Humanitarianism in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, 2021)
SSRN
Working paper
Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations in Regard to Refugees and Migrants
In: (Book chapter, forthcoming in Gibney, Krajewski and Vandenhole (eds.) Routledge Handbook on Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations, Routledge 2021)
SSRN
The Normative Impact of the Global Compact on Refugees
In: International journal of refugee law, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 605-610
ISSN: 1464-3715
The Normative Impact of the Global Compact on Refugees
In: Forthcoming in International Journal on Refugee Law, Special Issue on the Global Compacts
SSRN
International Cooperation on Migration Control: Towards a Research Agenda for Refugee Law
In: Revised version published in European Journal of Migration and Law, Band 20(4)
SSRN
Refugee Policy As 'Negative Nation Branding': The Case of Denmark and the Nordic
In: Revised version published in Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook, 2017
SSRN
The Perfect Storm: On Boat Migrants and Sovereignty
In: In Violeta Moreno-Lax and Efthymios Papastavridis (eds.) 'Boat Refugees' and Migrants at Sea: A comprehensive approach: Integrating Maritime security with human rights. Brill, 2016
SSRN
Bridging the Gap: Practice Theory in Interdisciplinary International Law and International Relations Scholarship
In: Nordic journal of international law, Band 93, Heft 1, S. 90-113
ISSN: 1571-8107
Abstract
Recent years have seen a new, by now almost normalized, openness towards empirical, interdisciplinary approaches within international law scholarship, in part driven by research conducted within the Nordics. Scholarship that bridges International Law and International Relations has been a key example, promising new insights on how power dynamics shape international law, and how international law in turn constitutes global order. However, interdisciplinary work combining both disciplines has also been met with critique, including accusations of disciplinary hegemony, a priori theorising, and not accounting for international law's normativity. This article argues that practice theory provides one possible way to address these challenges. Focusing on day-to-day legal practices, especially at the intersections of legal regimes, we identify three examples of particularly promising research avenues: state responses to international legal developments; international lawyers navigating overlapping communities of practice; and data-driven approaches for understanding how legal interpretations are negotiated across different groups of practitioners.
Mobility and legal infrastructure for Ukrainian refugees
In: International migration: quarterly review, Band 60, Heft 4, S. 213-216
ISSN: 1468-2435
Arctic Asylum: The Legal Regulation of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees in Greenland and Svalbard
In: Nordic journal of international law, Band 91, Heft 1, S. 148-171
ISSN: 1571-8107
Abstract
This article examines the regulation and rights of refugees and other foreigners in independent, overseas and other not fully sovereign territories. It analyses two Nordic cases, Greenland and Svalbard. Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, and Svalbard an unincorporated area subject to Norwegian sovereignty through the 1920 Spitsbergen Treaty. Unlike their parent states, both territories remain outside the Schengen Area. As this article highlights, both territories are subject to distinct regulatory frameworks in respect to asylum-seekers and refugees. While the number of asylum-seekers or refugees in each place is so far very limited, the regulatory differences nonetheless raise principled questions both from a rights-based perspective and at the more theoretical level. As this article argues, Greenland and Svalbard both exemplify how international law and late sovereign constructions may themselves provide for an unmooring of asylum and refugee rights within the ordinary statist framework. The effects in each case are multi-directional. On the one hand, the legal frameworks pertaining to these arctic territories provide for significantly more liberal rules in terms of access to asylum and immigration control. On the other hand, these legal bifurcations serve to upend the ordinary Nordic social contract and welfare rights owed to refugees and other aliens.
Arctic Asylum: The Legal Regulation of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees in Greenland and Svalbard
In: Forthcoming in Nordic Journal of International Law
SSRN
Regime Entanglement in the Emergence of Interstitial Legal Fields: Denmark and the Uneasy Marriage of Human Rights and Migration Law
In: Forthcoming in Nordiques, Band 40
SSRN