Legal Evolution and the 1951 Refugee Convention
In: International Migration, Band 59
40 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International Migration, Band 59
SSRN
In: International migration: quarterly review, Band 59, Heft 4, S. 257-260
ISSN: 1468-2435
World Affairs Online
In: (Book chapter, forthcoming in Puyvallée and Bjørkdahl (eds.), Do-Gooders at the End of Aid: Scandinavian Humanitarianism in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, 2021)
SSRN
Working paper
In: (Book chapter, forthcoming in Gibney, Krajewski and Vandenhole (eds.) Routledge Handbook on Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations, Routledge 2021)
SSRN
In: International journal of refugee law, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 605-610
ISSN: 1464-3715
In: Forthcoming in International Journal on Refugee Law, Special Issue on the Global Compacts
SSRN
In: Revised version published in European Journal of Migration and Law, Band 20(4)
SSRN
In: Revised version published in Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook, 2017
SSRN
In: In Violeta Moreno-Lax and Efthymios Papastavridis (eds.) 'Boat Refugees' and Migrants at Sea: A comprehensive approach: Integrating Maritime security with human rights. Brill, 2016
SSRN
In: Lakimies, Band 112(1)
SSRN
In: Journal of Refugee Studies, 2014, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: In Elspeth Guild and Paul Minderhoud (eds.) The First Decade of EU Migration and Asylum Law. Brill, 2011
SSRN
In: Udenrigs, Heft 2, S. 69-79
ISSN: 1395-3818
Europas grænsekontrol er i en brydningstid:EU's engagement i opbygning af stærkere fælles kontrol ved de ydre grænser er slående, men medlemsstaterne er fortsat ansvarlige for at varetage kontrollen.
In: Nordic journal of international law, Band 93, Heft 1, S. 90-113
ISSN: 1571-8107
Abstract
Recent years have seen a new, by now almost normalized, openness towards empirical, interdisciplinary approaches within international law scholarship, in part driven by research conducted within the Nordics. Scholarship that bridges International Law and International Relations has been a key example, promising new insights on how power dynamics shape international law, and how international law in turn constitutes global order. However, interdisciplinary work combining both disciplines has also been met with critique, including accusations of disciplinary hegemony, a priori theorising, and not accounting for international law's normativity. This article argues that practice theory provides one possible way to address these challenges. Focusing on day-to-day legal practices, especially at the intersections of legal regimes, we identify three examples of particularly promising research avenues: state responses to international legal developments; international lawyers navigating overlapping communities of practice; and data-driven approaches for understanding how legal interpretations are negotiated across different groups of practitioners.
In: International migration: quarterly review, Band 60, Heft 4, S. 213-216
ISSN: 1468-2435